Search for: "Reason v. Social Security Administration"
Results 361 - 380
of 1,962
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Sep 2022, 8:25 am
Under the arbitrary-and-capricious standard of review, a court must uphold a plan administrator’s decision so long as the administrator provides a “reasonable explanation for its decision, supported by substantial evidence. [read post]
9 May 2014, 5:57 am
FTC v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 3:25 pm
In Letvinuck v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 2:01 pm
Capato: The Social Security Administration Defines “Children” In Astrue v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 2:01 pm
Capato: The Social Security Administration Defines “Children” In Astrue v. [read post]
2 May 2023, 10:42 am
However, narrow tailoring is not confined to strict scrutiny cases, as seen in McCullen v. [read post]
23 May 2012, 3:44 pm
In addition, the Social Security Administration issued a fully favorable decision on Plaintiff's claim for disability benefits under Title II and Title XVI of the Social Security Act. [read post]
5 Jul 2023, 10:00 am
There are myriad legitimate and indeed compelling reasons the government might have to ask social media companies to remove content. [read post]
17 Mar 2011, 6:02 pm
Finally, the Ninth Circuit criticized CIGNA for failing to consider Salomaa’s Social Security disability award and for shifting the reason for its denial decision after Salomaa and his physician’s refuted CIGNA’s initial denial decision. [read post]
26 May 2015, 9:51 am
Administration is also considering policies, such as export controls on hacking tools. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 11:40 am
READ PARTS I-V (pp. 101-138 in SSRN version). [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 10:00 pm
Ten Reasons Why You Should Teach Here — And Three Why You Shouldn't (v. 4.0) 1. [read post]
25 Aug 2007, 11:24 am
Comm Social Security Southern District of Ohio at ColumbusKENNEDY, Circuit Judge. [read post]
9 Jun 2010, 1:48 pm
” In Nash v. [read post]
25 Apr 2012, 12:43 pm
Lynn Winmill had relied incorrectly on a 1989 Supreme Court decision that dealt with “a very unusual type of social security case” (Sullivan v. [read post]
10 May 2012, 9:00 am
Bland v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 2:04 pm
Note: This separation between church and state is extended to ministers and rabbis and other church leaders who are themselves exempt from Social Security taxes. [read post]
12 May 2014, 3:00 am
FTC v. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 1:37 pm
(Here, Attorney Ratliff prevailed on a claim for social security benefits wrongfully denied to her client, and was awarded fees of $2,112.60, all of which will now go to offset her client's federal debt.) [read post]
11 Jun 2012, 11:21 am
She delivered twins and applied for Social Security survivors benefits for them. [read post]
