Search for: "Ricci v. DeStefano"
Results 361 - 380
of 389
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jan 2018, 4:16 pm
Ricci v. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 9:29 am
In Ricci v. [read post]
24 Dec 2008, 12:01 pm
* SCOTUS docket hereSelected Pending Petitions for Certiorari: Ricci v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 9:42 am
(Ricci et al.. v. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 8:40 pm
Tags: Elena Kagan, Solicitor General Related posts Reflections on my First Live Oral Arguments – Ricci v. [read post]
Symposium: The Supreme Court recognizes but limits disparate impact in its Fair Housing Act decision
26 Jun 2015, 5:58 am
” Adopting the position articulated in Justice Scalia’s concurrence in Ricci v. [read post]
4 May 2009, 6:34 am
Rosen also mentions an affirmative action case, Ricci v. [read post]
16 May 2012, 9:33 am
One trenchant example is Ricci v. [read post]
29 Jun 2009, 10:16 am
DESTEFANO, ET AL. [read post]
1 Aug 2010, 3:01 pm
On abortion, for instance, Gonzales v. [read post]
29 Nov 2008, 11:47 am
Hulteen, No. 07-543Title VII/Denial of pre-'79 pregnancy leave service credits in computing pensiono Set for argument December 10, 2008o SCOTUSWIKI hereo LIIBULLETIN hereSelected Pending Petitions for Certiorari: Ricci v. [read post]
17 Jun 2014, 5:59 am
” The court also pointed to Ricci v. [read post]
27 Feb 2013, 8:33 pm
Holder with Fisher v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 3:30 am
Ricci v. [read post]
22 Dec 2008, 12:07 pm
SCOTUS docket here Noted here: Ross Runkel; Workplace Horizons; Mayer BrownSelected Pending Petitions for Certiorari: Ricci v. [read post]
5 Jan 2009, 3:15 am
SCOTUS docket hereSelected Pending Petitions for Certiorari: Ricci v. [read post]
3 Apr 2009, 3:49 am
City of Memphis, No. 08-744Title VII - (Ed. - According to Public Citizen, the issues appear similar to Ricci, above)o SCOTUS docket hereFederal Appellate Court DecisionsØ Paul Mollica's Daily Developments in EEO Law here1st CircuitSullivan v. [read post]
20 Aug 2011, 4:00 am
DeStefano were arbitrarily weighted, yielding an impermissible disparate impact. [read post]
11 Jul 2012, 9:57 pm
In the same Term that the Court avoided the constitutional question in NAMUDNO, it used the same avoidance canon to narrowly construe a different provision of the Voting Rights Act in Bartlett v Strickland, and it applied constitutional avoidance (in deed if not in name) to narrowly construe Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act in Ricci v DeStefano, the controversial New Haven firefighters case. [read post]
18 Apr 2010, 8:59 am
Supreme Court retirements inevitably produce much more coverage of process than substance. [read post]
