Search for: "Richard V Young" Results 361 - 380 of 887
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Jun 2016, 5:34 am
Rutgerson, supra.It also explains that on January 22, 2014,Richard Rutgerson responded to the e-mail address listed in the ad. [read post]
26 May 2016, 5:00 am by Nancy E. Halpern, D.V.M.
 A previous article by the author was quoted and largely followed by a unanimous New York appellate court in Nonhuman Rights Project, Inc. v. [read post]
16 May 2016, 4:04 pm
Mike Mireless explains the test in Alice Corp. v. [read post]
29 Apr 2016, 3:09 pm by Kent Scheidegger
  The ambiguous science does not really support the constitutional mandates that Steinberg supported either, as I explained in vain in CJLF's brief in Graham v. [read post]
25 Apr 2016, 4:21 pm by Eugene Volokh
Ashutosh Bhagwat, Richard Garnett, Andrew Koppelman, Seth Kreimer, Lawrence Lessig, Sanford Levinson, Robert O’Neil, David Post, Lawrence Sager, Seana Shiffrin, Steven Shiffrin, Geoffrey Stone, Nadine Strossen, William Van Alstyne and James Weinstein. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 12:58 pm by Alex R. McQuade
Russia has started to move artillery to areas in northern Syria where Syrian government forces have begun to group up, potentially in preparation for a return to fighting. [read post]
28 Mar 2016, 2:15 am by Cookson Beecher
Woloszyn said the two vibrios (V. coralliilyticus and V. tubiashii)  are major causes of larval shellfish mortality, which results in increased costs to the aquaculture industry and consumer. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 4:51 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Father John Fleming v Advertiser-News Weekend Publishing Company Pty Ltd  ([2016] SASC 26) the South Australian Supreme Court has found allegations published by The Sunday Mail and Adelaide Now that a former Anglican priest had sexual relations with an underage girl and engaged a homosexual affair with a young parishioner to be substantially true. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
Deputy High Court Judge, Richard Spearman QC, rejecting Mr Clifford’s evidence, finding in Mr Burrell’s favour. [read post]