Search for: "Rick Hills"
Results 361 - 380
of 894
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Jul 2015, 5:54 am
Lyle Denniston reported on the order for this blog, with other commentary coming from Rick Hasen at his Election Law Blog. [read post]
1 Jul 2015, 6:06 am
Commentary on the decision comes from our symposium on the decision, Josh Lee at casetext, and Rick Wilson at the Human Rights at Home Blog. [read post]
30 Jun 2015, 4:00 am
Commentary comes from Nathaniel Persily at the Stanford Lawyer, Rick Hasen at Slate (who also notes an error in Justice Ginsburg’s opinion for the Court at his Election Law Blog), Steven Schwinn at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog, Seth Davis at PrawfsBlawg, and Derek Muller at Excess of Democracy. [read post]
29 Jun 2015, 4:43 am
Still more commentary comes from Kenneth Jost at Jost on Justice; from Adam Winkler at the Huffington Post; at PrawfsBlawg, where posts come from Richard Re, Howard Wasserman (who has four posts on the decision and how it is being implemented), Paul Horwitz, Rick Hills, and Hadar Aviram; from Karl Laird at the Oxford Human Rights Hub; at the Human Rights at Home Blog from Noah Novogrodsky; and from John Culhane for POLITICO. [read post]
26 Jun 2015, 1:30 pm
Goldberg, Joseph Thai, and Erwin Chemerinsky, all at ACS Law, Leslie Loftis at The Federalist, Rick Hasen at Election Law Blog, with an additional post by him also on that blog, Ilya Shapiro and David Boaz, both at Cato at Liberty, Jane S. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 3:36 pm
Arsen at Ogletree Deakins, Wendy Parmet at Human Rights At Home Blog, Rick Hasen at Election Law Blog, the Constitutional Accountability Center, and Jonathan H. [read post]
25 Jun 2015, 7:56 am
Burwell in greater detail here (my initial critique) , here (response to Rick Hills), and here (response to Abigail Moncrieff). [read post]
23 Jun 2015, 6:51 am
So a couple of brief points before an extended discussion of one question, already taken up here on Prawfsblawg by Rick Hill (but I come out a bit different). whether to... [read post]
19 Jun 2015, 2:20 pm
Hill. [read post]
8 Jun 2015, 4:25 am
’” At The Hill, Alissa Wellek notes that the Court’s decision in Mellouli v. [read post]
28 May 2015, 6:20 am
Lobbying “K Street’s Gains Felt at Boutique Firms, Too” by Megan Wilson for The Hill Campaign Finance “Campaign Finance Watchdogs Push Justice Dept. to Investigate Jeb Bush’s PAC” by Ed O’Keefe for Washington Post “Arkansas AG Rejects Language for Campaign Finance Issue” by The Associated Press for Washington Times Virginia: “Conservative Group Paying Ken Cuccinelli’s Campaign” by Rachel Weiner for Washington Post… [read post]
21 May 2015, 8:00 am
Several high-profile American politicians—among them former presidential candidates Michele Bachmann, Rick Perry and Rick Santorum—have signed a “Marriage Vow” document produced in 2011 by the conservative organization Family Leader, according to Newsweek. [read post]
14 May 2015, 9:26 am
Rick Meyer is a Partner in the law firm of Dressman Benzinger LaVelle, with offices in Cincinnati, Ohio, Crestview Hills, Kentucky, and Louisville, Kentucky. [read post]
8 May 2015, 3:38 pm
Now, according to The Hill, he's turning to state hospitals to figure out how to replace... [read post]
5 Apr 2015, 7:05 am
And that prospect is only thrown into relief when we’re all laughing about Channing Tatum and Jonah Hill. [read post]
26 Mar 2015, 3:05 am
Commentary comes from Chris Kieser of the Pacific Legal Foundation’s Liberty Blog, Steven Schwinn at the Constitutional Law Prof Blog, Rick Hills at PrawfsBlawg, and Kent Scheidegger at Crime and Consequences. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 4:04 pm
” But she then suggests that the Court isn’t really serious about this, relying on Rick Hills’ reply to one of my earlier posts. [read post]
9 Mar 2015, 3:45 am
” At PrawfsBlawg, Rick Hills argues that the case “presents a golden opportunity for . . . a grand bargain” on federalism between liberals on the one side and libertarians and conservatives on the other, while at Balkinization Rob Weiner contends that silence in the history of the ACA regarding the consequences of the challengers’ reading “is thus a clarion refutation of the challengers’ claims. [read post]
8 Mar 2015, 2:00 pm
Over at PrawfsBlawg, Rick Hills says “yes. [read post]
7 Mar 2015, 8:23 pm
NYU law professor Rick Hills has written a thoughtful response to my post on federalism arguments in King v. [read post]
