Search for: "Riley v. California" Results 361 - 380 of 695
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Feb 2015, 3:00 pm by Cyrus Farivar
If passed, it would not just impose a warrant requirement to access e-mail, but would also require that law enforcement officials not interact with any electronic device in the possession of a citizen—to put the law in formal compliance with the unanimous 2014 Supreme Court decision Riley v. [read post]
28 Jan 2015, 1:15 pm
In Dariano the Ninth Circuit upheld a California high school’s decision to forbid students from wearing American flag T-shirts on Cinco de Mayo. [read post]
27 Jan 2015, 12:45 pm by Jeremy Gillula
Jones that Americans’ location history enjoys significant privacy protections, and in Riley v. [read post]
8 Jan 2015, 10:00 pm by Doug Austin
Plaintiff Slips, But Defendant Takes the Fall: In Riley v. [read post]
6 Jan 2015, 10:00 pm by Doug Austin
Battle Continues between Attorneys and Client over Attorneys’ Failure to Review Documents: In Price Waicukauski & Riley v. [read post]
5 Jan 2015, 2:19 pm by Jennifer Lynch
The Buza court notes the “stark contrast” between the Supreme Court’s analysis of privacy interests in DNA in King and its discussion of privacy interests in the data stored on our phones in Riley v. [read post]
26 Dec 2014, 3:24 am by Timothy P. Flynn
For their part, law enforcement leaders in Iowa have reacted cautiously to the announcement, implying the digital license may cause more problems for police departments than it solves.All of this brings to mind the recent SCOTUS decision in Riley v California, where the High Court ruled that in order for police to access the information on a motorists' cell phone, a warrant is required. [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 9:52 am by Omar Ha-Redeye
The Supreme Court of the United States has since clarified this position in Riley v. [read post]