Search for: "Risk v. Wells Market Service, Inc." Results 361 - 380 of 1,020
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Sep 2022, 6:57 am by Nedim Malovic
Nonetheless, the fact remained that that common element could be pronounced when the goods at issue were purchased, thus justifying the board’s finding that the signs were phonetically similar at least to an average degree.Conceptual similaritySince the mark applied for also referred to the concept of a ‘cat’, the board was also considered correct in concluding that the signs were conceptually highly similar.Global assessment of the likelihood of confusionIn view of the identity of… [read post]
24 May 2022, 5:00 am by John Jascob
The SEC charged an investment adviser that marketed its automated investment services as Shari’ah compliant without ensuring that client assets were invested in Shari’ah-compliant investments. [read post]
19 Sep 2023, 7:42 am by Eric Goldman
However, I don’t expect his “expert” services will be in high demand going forward LOL. * * * Arkansas Act 689 of 2023 NetChoice LLC v. [read post]
28 Sep 2015, 2:10 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
  With plaintiff’s and their attorneys increasingly are adding executives to the list of defendants named in their FLSA collective action claims, management should view appropriate FLSA compliance and risk management as critical to manage their own as well as their business’ liabilities. [read post]
28 Apr 2011, 5:22 am by SHG
Yesterday, a comment came in on my post from earlier this month on marketing legal services. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm by Peter W. Martin
A week earlier the New Mexico Supreme Court decided Sunnyland Farms, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Jul 2010, 4:00 am by Michel Généreux
See also the leading Supreme Court Case on this issue: ABB Inc. v. [read post]
18 Dec 2009, 12:12 pm by John W. Arden
The December 4 opinion in Kinetic Co. v. [read post]
7 Jan 2012, 7:48 am by Richard Renner
" This fact became immaterial after the ARB's well-considered decision in Johnson v. [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 2:32 pm by John Elwood
Ninth Inning, Inc., 19-1098Issues: (1) Whether an agreement among the members of a joint venture on how best to distribute the venture’s jointly created core product may be condemned under the Sherman Act without requiring the plaintiff to establish that defendants harmed competition in a properly defined antitrust market; and (2) whether, notwithstanding the Supreme Court’s decision in Illinois Brick Co. v. [read post]
20 Jun 2017, 10:30 am by Douglas Jarrett
A leading case that provides guidance for IRU grantees looking to minimize bankruptcy risk is WorldCom, Inv. and MCI WorldCom Network Services Inc. v. [read post]