Search for: "Roche v. Roche" Results 361 - 380 of 925
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2012, 3:04 am by New Books Script
Video game law / Jon Festinger, Chris Metcalfe, Roch Ripley ; with foreword by Don A. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 9:22 pm by Patent Docs
Perhaps it is because, as in Stanford v. [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 2:28 am
Just after Primus/Roche (in which I acted for Primus) I wrote that a case such as this is different from Primus-Roche, in which each of the Roche entities only infringed in their own country. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 3:33 pm
GAT v LuK) and Case C-539/03 Roche Nederland BV and Others v Frederick Primus and Milton Goldenberg (noted here by the IPKat). [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 9:46 am by Daniel West, Olswang LLP
It is however an established principle of Strasbourg jurisprudence that such a right does not extend so far as to impose a positive obligation on public authorities to disclose or distribute information (see Leander v Sweden (1987) 9 EHRR 433 or Roche v United Kingdom (2005) 42 EHRR 599). [read post]
12 Mar 2012, 1:47 pm by GuestPost
The ‘Junk’ decision in 2005 (C-188/03, Junk v Kuhnel) has meant, that worker consultations need now take place before any final decision on job losses is taken. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 12:58 pm by Marcus Rayner
Roche:   “The New Jersey Supreme Court’s decision in Kendall v. [read post]
26 Feb 2012, 11:48 pm by INFORRM
Firstly, the IPCC and the Metropolitan Police v The Guardian (clause 1). [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 7:42 am by Peter Rost
Senate, Governor of Indiana, Governor of Montana, Maryland Senate, Vermont Senate, New York City Council, Southern Medical Association, ESOMAR, NC Pharmacy Association, The Prescription Access Litigation Project, Minnesota Senior Federation, Danske Bank, Sveriges Riksdag, Sveriges Radio Sommar, Svenska Nyhetsbrev AB, Entreprenörsdagen, Stockholms Läns Landsting, Läkemedelskommittén i Jämtlands län, Gräv 08-Undersökande Journalister,… [read post]