Search for: "Rush v. Department of State"
Results 361 - 380
of 464
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Nov 2011, 11:46 am
Curran, Inc. v. [read post]
7 Oct 2011, 8:05 am
Furthermore, prohibition is never available merely to correct or prevent a mistake, error in procedure, or error in substantive law (see Matter of Oglesby v McKinney, 7 NY3d at 565; Matter of Morgenthau v Altman, 58 NY2d at 1058), even when such errors may be "grievous" (La Rocca v Lane, 37 NY2d at 579), or "egregious" (Matter of State of New York v King, 36 NY2d at 62). [read post]
28 Sep 2011, 10:40 am
Naxos, 830 NE 2d 250 (2005).See Goldstein v. [read post]
21 Sep 2011, 4:20 am
are rushing to cash in on the Marcellus Shale natural gas boom. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 3:47 am
Bezak, State v. [read post]
15 Jul 2011, 6:07 pm
However, I am disappointed when the state department of justice promotes such arguments, and I am doubly disappointed when the state Supreme Court rushes to embrace them without first thinking through the consequences. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 3:05 pm
Department of Revenue, 2005 WL 1604923 at *2 (Or. [read post]
15 May 2011, 11:24 am
United States v. [read post]
13 May 2011, 8:59 am
Nowhere has the process been transparent—and some states appear to have broken federal laws in their rush to execute. [read post]
9 May 2011, 1:30 pm
Making matters worse, this rush to incarcerate has severely strapped our state budgets. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 4:13 pm
United States, No. 1:10-cv-8435 (S.D.N.Y.) and Pedersen v. [read post]
11 Apr 2011, 12:27 pm
That decision is in conflict with numerous other circuit court decisions and the highest court of a state decided both before and after Bush v. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 9:21 am
Stopped in a bar, in a department store, in the airport, in a state park, and in at least three continents. [read post]
30 Mar 2011, 7:31 am
The petition in Foster v. [read post]
15 Mar 2011, 2:44 pm
Two Bush administration officials, former National Security Administration (NSA) director and former CIA director Michael V. [read post]
9 Mar 2011, 7:50 am
That case is Virginia v. [read post]
2 Mar 2011, 1:39 pm
EPA is compelled to do so by the Clean Air Act, the Supreme Court's decision in Massachusetts v. [read post]
20 Feb 2011, 6:06 pm
However, invariably judges will be asked to interpret these regulations - and as a recent California court case shows, their decisions may be unsettling.In Pineda v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 1:57 pm
Bank National Association v. [read post]
30 Dec 2010, 12:29 pm
In Wilcox v. [read post]
