Search for: "Russell v. U.s.*"
Results 361 - 380
of 504
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Dec 2012, 1:24 am
Jones, 529 U.S. at 856 (quoting Russell v. [read post]
5 Mar 2013, 1:01 pm
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys work for or contribute to this blog in various capacities, serves as counsel to the respondents in this case.] [read post]
24 May 2016, 5:04 pm
Carpenter 15-1193Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the petitioner in this case.Issue: (1) Whether a court must categorically deny a Rule 60(b)(6) motion premised on the change in decisional law produced by Martinez v. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 5:19 pm
Opinion below (6th Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply [Howe & Russell represents the petitioner] Docket: 08-1202 Title: IMS Health, Inc., et al. v. [read post]
6 Oct 2016, 8:29 am
Cooper v. [read post]
11 Dec 2009, 6:31 am
Opinion below (3d Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Case involving lawyers from Akin Gump or Howe & Russell (listed without regard to likelihood of being granted): Docket: 09-244 Title: United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 6:45 am
In Howes v. [read post]
21 Jun 2017, 7:59 am
(Harris v. [read post]
8 Apr 2009, 3:11 pm
In United States v. [read post]
1 Jun 2011, 6:48 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein, Howe & Russell filed an amicus brief in support of the respondent in the case.] [read post]
22 Oct 2021, 2:29 pm
Vega v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:47 am
Decker v. [read post]
25 Mar 2022, 5:35 pm
Ayres v. [read post]
25 Jun 2012, 9:47 am
Decker v. [read post]
14 Dec 2011, 1:14 pm
(Goldstein & Russell, P.C. represents Moncrieffe.) [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 7:29 am
Espinosa, 11-84, previously relisted once after the Court called for a response (and in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., represents the respondent). [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm
Our policy is to include and disclose all cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, represents either a party or an amicus in the case, with the exception of the rare cases in which Goldstein & Russell, P.C. represents the respondent(s) but does not appear on the briefs in the case. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 9:11 am
[Disclosure: Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, is among the counsel to the respondents in Patel.] [read post]
3 Oct 2017, 7:18 am
In Hamer v. [read post]
23 Jan 2014, 9:37 am
(Goldstein & Russell, P.C., whose attorneys contribute to this blog in various capacities, serves as counsel to the petitioner in Lane.) [read post]
