Search for: "S. R.C. T." Results 361 - 380 of 520
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Aug 2011, 3:44 am by Russ Bensing
Warner learns one of life’s invaluable lessons:  just because you can do something doesn’t mean you should. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 9:14 am by MBettman
Concluding Observations I wouldn’t be surprised if this case ends up back in the Supreme Court of Ohio. [read post]
16 Nov 2015, 7:25 am by MBettman
”) Ohio Senate Bill 10 (Ohio’s version of the federal Adam Walsh Act, which amends R.C. 2950 and establishes a three tier system for sex offenders with various registration, address verification, and community notification requirements.) [read post]
5 Dec 2016, 6:31 am
Accordingly, the appellate court in Sines held that the common pleas court impermissibly used Mentor's zoning ordinance as a basis for reversal (of the granting of liquor permits), contrary to R.C. 4303.292(A)(2)(a).So what is the moral of this story? [read post]
16 Oct 2015, 10:41 am by Eugene Volokh
As long as the kirpan remains a symbol and is neither designed nor adapted for use as a weapon, laws such as R.C. 2923.12 are wholly inapplicable. [read post]
20 Dec 2017, 7:05 am by Lisa Stam
It’s hard to feel like you belong if you don’t share similar traditions. [read post]
15 Oct 2018, 4:55 pm by Sarah Grant
But under R.C. 4.4, it noted, “[a] defense counsel who has entered an appearance in a Commission session will not be excused without permission of the Military Judge. [read post]
28 Mar 2014, 11:21 am by MBettman
” Case Syllabus Unvested military retirement benefits earned during marriage fall within the definition of marital property in R.C. 3105.171(A)(3)(a) and must be considered for division under R.C. 3105.171(C). [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 7:32 am by MBettman
Jacobs, 46 Ohio St.3d 176, 181 (1989) (“The legislature’s express inclusion of a discovery rule for certain torts arising under R.C. 2305.09, including fraud and conversion, implies the exclusion of other torts arising under the statute, including negligence. [read post]
8 Feb 2019, 6:22 am by MBettman
Hairston was later indicted and charged with violation of R.C. 2923.12, carrying a concealed weapon. [read post]
12 Jan 2012, 3:27 am by Russ Bensing
  I don’t buy that; as Grace notes, the whole purpose of the requirement for giving reasons is that without it, there’s no opportunity for meaningful judicial review of a sentence. [read post]
4 May 2011, 5:00 am by Russ Bensing
  Parker’s lawyer could have easily figured, “well, I can’t get anything in because it wasn’t raised below,” but instead spent the time scouring the web for cases. [read post]