Search for: "S. Sherman"
Results 361 - 380
of 6,007
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
26 Feb 2023, 9:25 am
Joint Traffic Assn., 171 U.S. 505, 19 S. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 5:16 am
No member of Congress spoke of an “officer under the Freedmen’s Bureau,” because the source of that officer’s authority was federal law, not the Freedmen’s Bureau. [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 6:21 am
Here’s the Thursday morning read: Supreme Court seems to favor tech giants in terror case (Jessica Gresko & Mark Sherman, The Associated Press) Supreme Court rules 9-0 that bankruptcy filers can’t avoid debt incurred by another’s fraud (Dan Mangan, CNBC) Supreme Court rejects Ohio man’s bid to sue police over arrest for Facebook parody (Lawrence Hurley, NBC News) Brett Kavanaugh Just Made the Best Argument for Saving the Internet… [read post]
23 Feb 2023, 4:30 am
In yesterday's argument in Twitter v. [read post]
21 Feb 2023, 6:00 am
“A caret represents creating room for expansion and for what is to come, making it the perfect representation for the company’s future,” said Jennifer Sherman, chief product and experience officer. [read post]
20 Feb 2023, 6:18 pm
” Mark Sherman of The Associated Press reports that “Supreme Court weighs liability shield for internet giants. [read post]
17 Feb 2023, 3:46 am
The EDRM MIH is more than simply a great idea that’s been rigorously developed and tested; it’s an open-source, collaborative effort of leading companies and technologists backed by the integrity and influence of the EDRM. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 10:53 pm
There are no more Sherman Act claims, and no more claims that are specifically about the licensing of FRAND-pledged standard-essential patents (SEPs).The question is where to go from here. [read post]
16 Feb 2023, 4:30 am
The Court’s post-1914 Sherman Act jurisprudence showed no sign of any legal change, constitutional or otherwise. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am
In fact, Bruen's focus on text as elucidated by legal history is nothing new in Second Amendment litigation. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 7:28 am
Sherman, the subcommittee’s Ranking Member, and Juan Vargas (D-Calif), Alexandra Thornton, Senior Director at the Center for American Progress, spoke about two things she views as problematic about private markets. [read post]
9 Feb 2023, 7:39 am
Here’s the Thursday morning read: Supreme Court justices discussed, but did not agree on, code of conduct (Robert Barnes & Ann E. [read post]
8 Feb 2023, 7:41 pm
Kahn; (Panel 2) Jackie Nolan-Haley and Sherman W. [read post]
5 Feb 2023, 3:42 pm
Under Kanter’s leadership, the antitrust division of DOJ filed a complaint in which it alleged that Google is monopolizing the market for online advertising in violation of Section 2 of the Sherman Act. [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 12:42 pm
Anderson, Jurecic, and Alan Rozenshtein sat down with Anna Bower for an episode of Rational Security to discuss the week’s big national security news stories, including the conclusion of the Fulton County special grand jury’s investigation into 2020 election interference, the brutal murder of Tyre Nichols by five police officers in Memphis, Tennessee, former President Donald Trump’s return to Meta’s platforms, and more: Justin… [read post]
3 Feb 2023, 6:22 am
Here’s the Friday morning read: High court offers bonuses, debt relief to lure police hires (Mark Sherman, Associated Press) Supreme Court challenges to Biden student loan plan hinge on overreach, financial harm (Annie Nova, CNBC) How Student Loan Forgiveness Could Win at the Supreme Court (Katherine Knott, Inside Higher Ed) Domestic abusers just got more gun rights, thanks to the Supreme Court (Jordan Rubin, MSNBC) Flimsy ‘Ethics Issues’ Regarding Chief Justice… [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 12:35 pm
Likewise, to decide whether a business arrangement constitutes an unlawful “restraint of trade” under the Sherman Act, a judge should ask whether American jurisdictions generally consider that arrangement anticompetitive. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 4:30 am
Panelists also expressed doubts about the wisdom of DOJ bringing more “criminal Sherman Act Section 2” cases. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 6:31 am
Didden, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Tuesday, January 31, 2023 Editor's Note: Damian G. [read post]
31 Jan 2023, 6:31 am
Didden, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, on Tuesday, January 31, 2023 Editor's Note: Damian G. [read post]
