Search for: "SCHERING-PLOUGH" Results 361 - 380 of 404
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Sep 2011, 12:08 pm by Peter Rost
BIOGRAPHY AND CV CONTACT INFORMATION CLIENT LISTEXPERT WITNESS SERVICESMEDIACONGRESS LETTER ON BEHALF OF DR. [read post]
23 Jul 2009, 3:15 am
We wouldn't base a motion solely on Actimmune, but with Pennsylvania Employees as the lead case, Actimmune is useful supporting precedent.Another candidate for best supporting actor in this area is In re Schering-Plough Corp. [read post]
17 Jan 2007, 8:11 am
In addition, Walt Disney, First Data, Schering-Plough, and Zimmer Holdings have agreed to adopt majority voting in response to proposals from the Sheet Metal Workers International Association (SMWIA). [read post]
31 Mar 2010, 1:51 am
Judge Approves Zero-Dollar Settlement of Class Action Over Merck Merger New Jersey Law Journal A class action suit over the merger of drug giants Merck and Schering-Plough has ended in a settlement that pays nothing to the class but $3.5 million in fees to class counsel. [read post]
14 Jun 2010, 6:30 pm by Gene Quinn
., 332 F.3d 896 (6th Cir. 2003), the Federal Trade Commission and the Antitrust Division of the United States Department of Justice both consider them presumptively anticompetitive, see In re Schering Plough Corp., No. 9297 (F.T.C. [read post]
30 Dec 2016, 8:33 am by Ad Law Defense
Schering-Plough Corp., 145 F.3d 601, 612-13 (3d Cir. 1998) (finding no nexus between challenged insurance policy and services offered to the public from insurance office); Parker v. [read post]
19 Sep 2013, 9:53 am by Bexis
The following post is exclusively the work of the Reed Smith side of the blog.Sometimes the smallest, least significant type of lawsuit can illustrate cracks in the edifice of the largest, most consequential litigation. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Plough, Inc., that state law would not require warnings in Spanish where the FDA required only English language warnings:[W]e reject plaintiff's attempt to place on nonprescription drug manufacturers a duty to warn that is broader in scope and more onerous than that currently imposed by applicable statutes and regulations. the FDA has stressed that "it is in the best interest of the consumer, industry, and the marketplace to have uniformity in the presentation and clarity of… [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 10:56 am by Bexis
Oct. 7, 2009) (“[m]erely alleging that [defendant] marketed the drugs at issue for off-label purposes does not state a claim for fraud”); In re Schering-Plough Corp. [read post]
21 Jun 2008, 10:01 pm
About 90% of the attendees were the chief legal officer of their companies or just a rung or two below, representing companies such as GE, Cisco, Tyco, Schering Plough, FMC, and other major companies you've heard of. [read post]
12 Oct 2007, 7:03 am
Schering-Plough Corp., 2006 WL 2546494, at *2 (E.D. [read post]
16 Aug 2009, 11:23 am
(Editor's Note: This post is based on a Simpson Thacher & Bartlett memorandum, which first appeared as an article in the New York Law Journal.) [read post]
29 Dec 2022, 10:14 am by David Whitaker and Shearil Matthews
ADA Background In 1990, Congress passed the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA or Act”).[1] The purpose of the Act is to provide protection and certain rights for Americans with disabilities. [read post]
30 May 2011, 4:55 am by Marie Louise
Egg World, LLC (Seattle Trademark Lawyer) Parties choose ACR, TTAB finds SOLARIN not confusingly similar to SOLARCAINE for sun/tanning products: Schering-Plough HealthCare Products, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Apr 2008, 10:39 am
March 25, 2008) ("the Court may take judicial notice of and consider the public records of the FDA, such as the Public Health Advisory"); Schering-Plough Healthcare Products, Inc. v. [read post]
17 Feb 2012, 11:29 am by Bexis
Schering-Plough Corp., 842 A.2d 174, 177-78 (N.J. [read post]