Search for: "SMITH v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE"
Results 361 - 380
of 1,293
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
21 May 2017, 9:01 pm
So held the he Appellate Division, Third Department in its May 11, 2017 decision in Flikweert v. [read post]
25 Jul 2011, 1:07 am
Maxwell, R. v [2010] UKSC 48 (20 July 2011) Supreme Court: by 3-2 majority, it was right to order retrial of man accused of murder despite gross police misconduct New Judgment: R v Smith (Appellant) [2011] UKSC 37 « UKSC blog In a post on some of the interesting judgments which came out last week, Obiter J described R v Smith as a case concerning Imprisonment for Public Protection (IPP) under the Criminal Justice Act 2003 s225(3)… [read post]
8 May 2020, 3:43 am
The justices also sent United States v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 5:00 am
Speaking through Justice Amy Coney Barrett, the Justices elaborated upon their less constricted version of the “authority or duty” test in a way that provides some guidance to government officials. [read post]
14 Feb 2012, 12:42 am
Employment Division, Department of Human Resources of Oregon v. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 10:56 am
Smith: Does the Department of Justice recognize that federal courts have the authority in appropriate circumstances to strike federal statutes because of one or more constitutional infirmities? [read post]
24 Feb 2022, 7:15 pm
Department of Justice (DOJ) to combat cybersecurity fraud, and some of the schemes promoting alleged telehealth fraud during the ongoing COVID-19 public health emergency. [read post]
29 Mar 2016, 8:06 am
When the Court granted certiorari in CRST Van Expedited v. [read post]
5 Sep 2019, 12:53 pm
In Smith v. [read post]
30 May 2016, 8:48 am
Smith. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 7:47 am
Jerry Seper of the Washington Times reports on testimony by a Justice Department in the Senate on the effects of the Court’s decision on FOIA procedures in Milner v. [read post]
2 May 2012, 3:05 pm
Department of Justice’s Office of Legal Counsel (OLC) from 2001 to 2003, liable for damages they allege they suffered from these unlawful actions. [read post]
14 Jul 2012, 3:00 am
The nominally private charter or status of the entities in question is not determinative, however (see Smith, 92 NY2d at 713-716; Holden v Board of Trustees of Cornell Univ., 80 AD2d 378, 380-381 [3d Dept 1981]). [read post]
6 May 2019, 12:05 pm
(relisted after the March 22, March 29, April 12, April 18 and April 26 conferences) Department of Homeland Security v. [read post]
9 Jul 2022, 6:01 am
Quinta Jurecic explained the importance of Justice Department independence in light of the House select committee’s recent hearings. [read post]
10 Dec 2007, 6:16 am
Justice Souter so wrote for the Court despite the fact that in an earlier case, Smith v. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 8:33 am
In fact, the Court said this “just three Terms ago” in Smith v. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 2:55 pm
For example, those two Justices dissented to argue in Graham v. [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 7:18 am
Smith, an assets forfeiture case heard two weeks ago. [read post]
11 Jan 2019, 2:32 pm
And in North Carolina Department of Revenue v. [read post]
