Search for: "STANFORD V. STATE" Results 361 - 380 of 2,152
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Feb 2021, 2:23 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  According to a study performed by Stanford Law School and cited by the Delaware Supreme Court, 45 percent of Securities Act cases filed in state court in 2019 had a parallel action filed in federal court asserting the same claims. [read post]
15 Feb 2021, 7:56 am by Eric Goldman
The Ninth Circuit emphatically rejected the state action argument in PragerU v. [read post]
14 Feb 2021, 12:57 pm by Victoria Gallegos
Rubenstein analyzed the potential impact of Texas v. [read post]
3 Feb 2021, 2:30 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  The report attributes the decline in the number of state court lawsuits to the March 2020 decision in Salzberg v. [read post]
15 Jan 2021, 6:50 pm by kris
The lawsuit also states that the proportionality gap is equal to around 50 opportunities. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 8:07 am by Eric Goldman
  This post will discuss only one Section 230 ruling, the Bolger v. [read post]
11 Jan 2021, 2:56 am by INFORRM
Sullivan Ohio State Law Journal, Forthcoming, Roger Williams Univ. [read post]
4 Jan 2021, 1:26 pm by Kevin LaCroix
My tally of the COVID-19 suits differs from that of other publicly available sources, such as, for example, the Stanford Law School Securities Class Action Clearinghouse (whose tally can be found here). [read post]
27 Dec 2020, 9:06 pm by Series of Essays
COVID-19 and Access to Medical Care in the United States May 26, 2020 | Allison K. [read post]
18 Dec 2020, 9:30 am by Riana Pfefferkorn
The Supreme Court recently heard its first big Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA) case, United States v. [read post]
15 Dec 2020, 4:05 am by Howard Friedman
  The complaint (full text) in Saint Michael Academy, Inc. v. [read post]
11 Dec 2020, 4:47 pm by Katitza Rodriguez
We also are protected by the longstanding rule in Kyllo v. [read post]
10 Dec 2020, 12:21 pm by Will Baude
Many of the doctrines Keller identifies operate much the way Chief Justice Marshall's account of judicial review operated in Marbury v. [read post]