Search for: "STANLEY V JUSTICE"
Results 361 - 380
of 559
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
14 Sep 2011, 5:38 am
” Smith v. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 5:38 am
” Smith v. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 8:40 am
"It's obviously great for drug companies, its great for the lawyers, it's great for the Justice Department to bring in a token scalp every now and then, so everybody involved wins, and that is why it continues. [read post]
7 Sep 2011, 3:07 pm
See, e. g., Stanley v. [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 7:11 am
Not likely: Apple v Samsung (ArsTechnica) New Zealand Kiwi ISP boss says that three strikes is the wrong model (1709 Blog) Sweden 15-year-old schoolboy on trial after head teacher tells police about file-sharing (TorrentFreak) United Kingdom Digital Economy Act’s copyright provisions should be repealed, Lib Dem policy proposal says (Out-Law.com) IPO is training prosecutors on IP crime (Out-Law.com) (IPKat) United States US Patents Justice Rothstein… [read post]
26 Aug 2011, 7:05 am
Stanley, 141 Cal. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 12:09 pm
Central Mortgage Company v. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 10:48 am
(See Melone v. [read post]
17 Aug 2011, 2:32 pm
Daniel Shaviro, Man Who Lost too Much: Zarin v. [read post]
12 Aug 2011, 11:37 am
., v. [read post]
Following Judge Sutton’s rejection of the “inactivity” argument, the Supreme Court can take its time
5 Aug 2011, 1:00 pm
Lopez (1995) and United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 10:02 am
(Anything by Earle Stanley Gardner (Perry Mason); his stories were part of the reason I became a lawyer. [read post]
28 Jul 2011, 4:39 am
Family Law Week has published two judgments in the case of N v N, which went before the Court of Appeal at the end of June. [read post]
26 Jul 2011, 7:34 pm
After a flurry of decisions in the 1960s and 70s (Stanley v. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 5:20 pm
On 13 July 2011 Stanley Burnton and Aikens LLJ refused the claimant permission to appeal in the case of Smith -v- ADVFN Plc & Ors. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 10:08 pm
In Wheaton v. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 8:14 am
” And writing for the Opinionator blog of the New York Times, Stanley Fish discusses the decisions in Bennett and Brown v. [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 8:30 am
Court and OSC Review In coming to its conclusion, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice cited the Supreme Court of Canada’s decision in BCE Inc v 1976 Debentureholders (BCE) for the proposition that three conditions must be satisfied by a corporation seeking an arrangement: that statutory procedures have been met; that the application has been put forward in good faith; and that the arrangement is fair and reasonable. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 12:14 pm
Victor Stanley, Inc. v. [read post]
