Search for: "STATE IN THE INTEREST OF L. A. Vs." Results 361 - 380 of 554
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jan 2012, 1:45 pm by My name
  Until then, small entities must take whatever steps are advisable to protect their interests, and err on the side of caution with regards to submitting provisional applications early and often. [read post]
5 Jan 2012, 9:27 am by Jack Howell
Business changes effective in 2012 (or went into effect in December of 2011 and are thus “new”), include the following: New guidance on deduction vs. capitalization of tangible property costs. [read post]
31 Dec 2011, 1:19 pm by Law Lady
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION, Appellee. 5th District.Mortgage foreclosure -- Relief from judgment -- Absence of sworn motion or evidenceNOVASTAR MORTGAGE, INC., Appellant, vs. [read post]
24 Dec 2011, 9:25 am
Justice Dalveer BhandariSupreme Court of IndiaThe Supreme Court in Siddharam Satlingappa Mhetre Vs. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 1:20 am by Webmaster
O2 Micro Int’l Ltd., 558 F.3d 1341 (Fed. [read post]
28 Nov 2011, 1:59 am
 The survey did not differentiate between raw milk consumed on the farm vs. purchased by a customer. [read post]
5 Nov 2011, 3:41 pm by Joshua Auriemma
Two things I should state up front: When I began law school, I was very much in the Lexis camp. [read post]
4 Nov 2011, 12:31 pm by George Lenard
Int’l Longshoremen’s Assoc., 457 U.S. 702 (1982), the Supreme Court ruled on the second issue, holding that an injunction pending arbitration could not be ordered. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 9:12 pm by Badrinath Srinivasan
Once again the Court has handed us three leading cases on closely-related themes – and these decisions have turned out in fact to be in many ways the most interesting of the lot. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 7:39 am by Frank Pasquale
That year, Wall Street firms paid $18 billion in bonuses, according to the New York State Controller. . . . [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 7:37 am by Frank Pasquale
There are ample opportunities to investigate fraud in an episode that was 70 times as costly as the S&L crisis. [read post]
16 Oct 2011, 6:42 pm by Law Lady
MOODY, JONES, INGINO & MOREHEAD, P.A., and GENERAL MOTORS ACCEPTANCE CORPORATION, a/k/a GMAC, Appellees. 4th District.Civil rights -- Municipal corporations -- Ordinance -- Constitutionality -- Four homeless plaintiffs challenge constitutionality of municipal ordinance, which authorizes city agents to issue temporary trespass warning for city property on which warning recipient violates city or state law, and second ordinance, which prohibits storage of personal property on public… [read post]