Search for: "STATE OF MICHIGAN v. EPA" Results 361 - 380 of 448
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Nov 2016, 1:53 pm by Ronald Collins
Question: In his essay, Joondeph states that “there is no benchmark for how often the Chamber of Commerce should prevail if the Roberts Court were ‘business neutral. [read post]
7 Apr 2010, 3:44 pm by admin
SETTLEMENTS EPA to Allow States Address Rising Ocean Acidity. [read post]
28 Jan 2011, 1:30 pm by WIMS
Wilcox- Precon Development Corporation v. [read post]
12 Nov 2014, 8:17 am
 Further, as Justice Kagan explained in another case from last term (Michigan v. [read post]
19 Jul 2018, 9:30 pm by Bobby Chen
This same week, EPA’s Inspector General issued a separate report, following from the Flint, Michigan water crisis, that urges the agency to improve its oversight of state public drinking water programs more generally. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 3:17 pm by admin
This Settlement Agreement proposes to compromise a claim the United States has at this Site for Past Response Costs, as those terms are defined in the Settlement Agreement. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 7:28 am by John Ehrett
Michigan 14-8106Issue: (1) Whether Miller v. [read post]
16 Mar 2011, 1:21 pm by WIMS
And they'd be especially devastating for states like Kentucky and other coal states. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 8:27 am by WIMS
On American Chemistry Council v. [read post]
16 Jun 2016, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Court of Appeals for the D.C Circuit that allowed the rule to remain in effect while the EPA revised the way it considered costs in crafting the regulation—a process required by the Supreme Court’s ruling last year in Michigan v. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 8:01 am
  Senators, whether Democrat or Republican, from coal states or manufacturing states will find it very difficult to support cap and trade legislation. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm by Mary Dwyer
§ 7410’s express limit on the EPA’s disapproval authority and decisions of other courts of appeals, the EPA may substitute its own policy preferences for a state’s about the appropriate means of controlling air pollution within that state, without identifying any applicable “requirement of th[e] [Clean Air Act]” with which the state’s chosen means would interfere; and (2) whether the panel erred under SEC… [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 6:29 am by Mark Walsh
The cases concern an EPA regulation under the Clean Air Act called the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule, or Transport Rule. [read post]