Search for: "STATE OF RHODE ISLAND v. STATE OF MASSACHUSETTS" Results 361 - 380 of 414
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2009, 12:00 pm by Barry A. Guryan
The Non-Competition clause and the Trade Secrets clause stated that Rhode Island law applied. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 10:01 pm
  There are many state specific blogs related to family law topics, representing 38 states (and several foreign countries). [read post]
20 Aug 2009, 8:12 am
The Regional Office Privacy Advisors will offer guidance and education to covered entities, business associates, and individuals on their rights and responsibilities related to the HIPAA Privacy and Security RulesThe names, addresses, and contact information for each of the Regional Managers are listed together with a list of the States for which each Regional Manager has responsibility are listed below:Region I - Boston (Connecticut, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire,… [read post]
17 Aug 2009, 10:44 am
I have linked each company name to its corresponding record at the Massachusetts Secretary of State's office (or Secretary of the Commonwealth - whatever). [read post]
22 Jul 2009, 3:17 am
Given that MediaSentry did not conduct its monitoring from Massachusetts, does not maintain a presence in the state, and the computer on which MediaSentry detected Tenenbaum's file-sharing was located in Rhode Island at the time, Massachusetts' wiretapping and licensing provisions would not seem to reach the conduct at issue at all. [read post]
8 May 2009, 10:48 am
Mass. lawyer/escort attacked at knife point [Massachusetts Lawyer] Man charged with assaulting escort [Rhode Island News] Related: Rhode Island - Ford Escort - Providence Journal - United States - Craigslist [read post]
15 Apr 2009, 4:44 am
What we're doing here is the start, not the end, of relevant research.Also, if you think we didn't get your state right, please let us know. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
Md. 1975), aff'd, 567 F.2d 269 (4th Cir. 1977).Massachusetts: Vassallo v. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 4:42 am
These states are California, Colorado,Connecticut, Iowa, Illinois, Maine, Minnesota, New Jersey, New Mexico, Oregon, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 10:00 am
The States of Arizona, Maryland and Massachusetts also joined as friends of the court. [read post]
11 Feb 2009, 4:54 am
  Courts in Rhode Island, Oklahoma and Texas have ruled against such recognition. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 4:42 pm
In short, the court declined jurisdiction because Rhode Island does not recognize same sex marriages.- Garry J. [read post]
15 Jan 2009, 3:08 pm
The states with the highest percentages of Latino students attending highly segregated schools (90-100% minority) are: New York, Texas, California, Illinois, New Jersey, Arizona, Rhode Island, Florida, New Mexico, and Maryland.These rates of racial isolation are not inevitable. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:06 pm
Hardman, No. 08-1342 Absent any allegation that state officials were used to enforce the process, Defendant was not transformed into a state actor for section 1983 purposes when he issued a subpoena commanding the Plaintiff to appear at a pretrial deposition, even though the subpoena was issued in his capacity as a notary public and in the name of the state of Rhode Island. [read post]
13 Dec 2008, 11:39 am
The limo driver picked the men up at a bar in South Boston, where they had been drinking, and drove them to a strip club in Rhode Island, stopping along the way to purchase even more alcohol. [read post]
7 Oct 2008, 1:50 am
The Mass. court found that as a result of Hernandez, same-sex marriage was "prohibited" in New York, as of the date of that decision, but since there had not been any ruling on the question in Rhode Island, couples from that state could obtain marriage licenses in Massachusetts. [read post]
28 Jul 2008, 7:30 pm
Ormiston which held that Rhode Island courts did not have jurisdiction to hear a divorce case between two people of the same-sex because the state did not recognize the marriage. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 6:25 pm
The Rhode Island Supreme Court faced an analogous question, at least as it construed the issue before it, in its recent ruling in Chambers v. [read post]