Search for: "STATE v ENGLISH"
Results 361 - 380
of 7,321
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Oct 2010, 2:18 am
Those looking for a clear statement that pre-nuptial agreements are akin to contracts in English law will be disappointed. [read post]
22 Aug 2016, 8:44 am
” State v Nelson, 1998 SD 124; 587 NW2d 439, 444 (1998). [read post]
24 Aug 2010, 7:09 am
Henry, 125 F.3d 1305, 1309 (9th Cir.1997) (citing English v. [read post]
23 Nov 2008, 12:13 pm
Commission shows just how sensitive and litigious the member States are about languages. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 2:22 pm
Let’s talk about the decision in McCullen v. [read post]
18 Apr 2016, 8:49 am
United States that its June 2015 decision in Johnson v. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 12:51 pm
Fernández Arroyo, The curious case of an arbitration with two annulment courts: comments on the YPF saga Rushmi Sethi, International Arbitration: The Secretary of State for the Home Department v Raytheon Systems Ltd, and enforcement of arbitration awards in England and Wales [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 9:14 am
United States Department of Defense, docket number 09-2375. [read post]
5 Dec 2008, 6:15 am
France, (ECHR, Dec. 4, 2008) [in English, Word.doc] and Kervanci v. [read post]
18 Jul 2018, 6:28 am
The court held that under the scheme in Pt 5A, a migrant’s English speaking abilities were a neutral factor. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 10:01 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Jun 2015, 4:34 am
On 25 February 2015, the Supreme Court handed down its judgments in R (oao Rotherham Metropolitan BC and Ors) v Secretary of State for Business, Innovation and Skills [2015] UKSC 6. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 6:31 pm
United States in Plain English. [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 5:57 am
Daniel v. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 3:18 pm
It is an English decision, so unlike the Glasgow one, could not simply treat MA as a decision of the English and Welsh High Court. [read post]
9 Oct 2013, 3:18 pm
It is an English decision, so unlike the Glasgow one, could not simply treat MA as a decision of the English and Welsh High Court. [read post]
31 Mar 2008, 3:31 pm
In New Jersey v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 5:24 pm
in Virginia v. [read post]
10 Jul 2018, 8:38 am
The case is US v. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 1:35 pm
Marshall was the author of one of the Court’s best-known opinions, tMarbury v. [read post]
