Search for: "STATE v MANN" Results 361 - 380 of 938
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Mar 2013, 9:36 pm by Kim Nayyer
In Opinion analysis: Justices reject publisher’s claims in gray-market copyright case, SCOTUSblog (Mar. 19, 2013, 12:22 PM), Ronald Mann of SCOTUSblog nicely summarizes the ruling, in Plain English: In Kirtsaeng v. [read post]
22 Jan 2010, 11:45 am
1-22-2010 National:Should courts adopt a new set of Fourth Amendment rules to regulate how the police can search computers for evidence? [read post]
12 Jul 2007, 2:24 pm
 In this case, the court held that the restrictions were unreasonable.Hardy v. [read post]
10 Mar 2008, 3:30 pm
Did Spitzer commit a violation of the Mann Act, 18 USC 2422? [read post]
21 Feb 2019, 4:20 am by Edith Roberts
Ronald Mann has this blog’s analysis of yesterday’s argument in Mission Product Holdings Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2017, 4:44 am by Edith Roberts
Ronald Mann analyzes the opinion for this blog. [read post]
15 Jan 2020, 4:11 am by Edith Roberts
Ronald Mann analyzes the opinion for this blog. [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 11:55 pm
Mann, 562 F.2d 1104, 1116 (8th Cir.1977) (emphasis added), but suggested in another case that information must be disclosed before it could give rise to a cause of action, Merritt v. [read post]
2 Dec 2019, 3:39 am by Edith Roberts
First up is New York State Rifle & Pistol Association Inc. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2014, 2:31 am by Matrix Legal Information Team
It stated that Vos J’s decision to make the order was well within the margin accorded to the case management decision and the decisions taken by Norris J to issue to the “Unless order” and Mann J to refuse relief from sanctions were also correct in principle after their careful consideration of the competing arguments. [read post]
4 Apr 2014, 11:04 am by Timothy Simeone
During Wednesday’s argument in Fifth Third Bancorp v. [read post]
25 Feb 2018, 11:45 am
  The courts have stated that this is a "key factor" in determining whether an agreement results in a transfer of ownership (Apex Eyewear v Miracle Optics (2006)). [read post]