Search for: "STATE v MARTINEZ" Results 361 - 380 of 1,776
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Apr 2018, 5:19 pm by Lindsay M. Harris
Martinez issued an 18-page order granting the plaintiffs’ motion for summary judgment in the Mendez Rojas v. [read post]
29 Mar 2018, 7:01 am by John Elwood
United States and Beckles v. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 11:49 am by Jessica Perry
In determining that 7-Eleven properly classified the franchisees as independent contractors, the court applied the three-prong test outlined by the California Supreme Court in Martinez v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 8:04 am by Evan Lee
As I remarked in my argument preview, in light of the Supreme Court’s 6-2 decision for the petitioner in Molina-Martinez v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 7:38 am by Evan Lee
An even gloomier portent for the government is the Supreme Court’s 2016 decision in Molina-Martinez v. [read post]
22 Jan 2018, 4:08 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Accordingly, the complaint, insofar as asserted by them, was a nullity, and the action as to them was improperly commenced (see Hilton Apothecary v State of New York, 89 NY2d 1024 [1997]; Boente v Peter C. [read post]
11 Jan 2018, 5:20 pm by Aurora Barnes
The petition of the day is: Brown v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 7:13 am by Amanda Pickens Nitto
December 20, 2017) (putative class action brought under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act against Houston Baptist University for alleged solicitation of consumers for college classes via telephone calls using an automated telephone dialing system) Martinez, et al. v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 7:13 am by Amanda Pickens Nitto
December 20, 2017) (putative class action brought under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act against Houston Baptist University for alleged solicitation of consumers for college classes via telephone calls using an automated telephone dialing system) Martinez, et al. v. [read post]
1 Jan 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Online state surveillance The UK’s Investigatory Powers Act 2016 (IP Act), partially implemented in 2016 and 2017, is expected to come fully in force in 2018. [read post]
18 Dec 2017, 10:52 am by Graham Smith
It asks questions around mere accessibility as a threshold for jurisdiction (as found in Pez Hejduk) and the eDate/Martinez ‘centre of interests’ criterion for recovery in respect of the entire harm suffered throughout the EU. [read post]