Search for: "STATE v PIERRE" Results 361 - 380 of 453
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Dec 2010, 10:22 pm by legalinformatics
First, those opposed to Sotomayor reinforce what Pierre Schlag calls a “grid aesthetic” of American law, where “law is etched in stone” and there is little room for interpretation outside of the “bright-line rules” inscribed in the law. [read post]
19 Dec 2010, 4:35 pm by Lawrence Solum
The rule that disqualifies persons who are not 35 years of age from eligibility for the Presidency of the United States is quite hard or rigid. [read post]
14 Dec 2010, 10:38 pm by Michael Geist
  In reviewing copying practices in the law library of the Law Society of Upper Canada, the court stated: The fair dealing exception, like other exceptions in the Copyright Act, is a user’s right. [read post]
7 Dec 2010, 9:15 pm by Jacob Katz Cogan
Panagiotis Delimatsis & Pierre Sauvé, Financial Services Trade after the Crisis: Policy and Legal ConjecturesGary N. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 4:53 pm by www.LowerWC.com
"  In a case of first impression on the issue of the bunkhouse rule [Pierre v. [read post]
26 Nov 2010, 2:38 pm by Dwight Sullivan
”  Pierre Schlag, Spam Jurisprudence, Air Law, and the Rank Anxiety of Nothing Happening (A Report on the State of the Art), 97 Geo. [read post]
8 Nov 2010, 8:37 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Copyright owners don’t have to state a good-faith belief in infringement under penalty of perjury; the only thing required to be stated under penalty of perjury is that the sender is an agent of the copyright owner. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
General Motors Corp., 575 P.2d 1162, 1168-69 (Cal. 1978); see State Dept. of Health Services v. [read post]
1 Sep 2010, 11:46 am by Roshonda Scipio
. : Nolo, 2010.Capital PunishmentKFT565.C2 T46 2010Tennessee's new abolitionists : the fight to end the death penalty in the volunteer state / edited by Amy L. [read post]
4 Aug 2010, 2:00 am
The gist of the matter is that Google will introduce a notice-and-take-down procedure in response to the ruling of the Court of Justice of the European Union this March in the Google AdWords case, Joined Cases C-236, 237 and 238/08 Google France, Google Inc. v Louis Vuitton Malletier; Google France v Viaticum Luteciel; Google France v CNRRH Pierre? [read post]