Search for: "STATE v. BATES"
Results 361 - 380
of 645
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 May 2012, 8:55 am
Bates, 315 S.W.3d 77, 85 (Tex. [read post]
22 May 2012, 8:55 am
Bates, 315 S.W.3d 77, 85 (Tex. [read post]
22 May 2012, 8:03 am
CASE OF SCOPPOLA v. [read post]
21 May 2012, 4:54 am
United States: Dominique Strauss-Kahn, former head of the IMF, has filed a countersuit of defamation against the hotel maid who accused him of sexual assault. [read post]
20 May 2012, 1:10 pm
All the defendant need do is state during the plea colloquy that he is in fact innocent of the charged crime, but wants to plea guilty anyway, while with bated breath his Clearwater Criminal Defense Attorney curses the result.In federal court in Tampa Bay and Pinellas a defendant may have difficulty changing his plea to guilty unless he states on the record that he is pleading because he is in fact guilty. [read post]
18 May 2012, 9:43 am
Ct.), with introductory note by Elizabeth Stubbins Bates Garcia v. [read post]
15 May 2012, 9:28 am
The case is Scoppola v. [read post]
14 May 2012, 10:50 am
Dean Spielmann, Judge of the European Court of Human Rights and President of Section V of the Court will deliver the keynote address on 8 June 2012. [read post]
14 May 2012, 4:33 am
Resolved cases include: Mr Stephen Wren v Daily Mail (Clause 1), 11/05/2012; A man v The Sun (Clause 1), 11/05/2012; Worcestershire Acute Hospitals NHS Trust v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 11/05/2012; Ms Louise Pyne v Daily Mail, Clause 1, 08/05/2012. [read post]
11 May 2012, 2:19 am
It isn’t just friendly, inoffensive speech that is protected: Sedley LJ’s statement (in Redmond-Bates v DPP (1999) 163 JP 789 that “freedom only to speak inoffensively is not worth having” was cited amongst others to this effect. [read post]
7 May 2012, 4:18 am
This week will see the State Opening of Parliament. [read post]
7 May 2012, 1:47 am
It isn’t just friendly, inoffensive speech that is protected: Sedley LJ’s statement (in Redmond-Bates v DPP (1999) 163 JP 789 that “freedom only to speak inoffensively is not worth having” was cited amongst others to this effect. [read post]
4 May 2012, 11:46 am
JONES v. [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 1:30 am
Coomber heard 9 and 16 November 2011 (HHJ Moloney QC) El-Naschie v Macmillan, heard 11, 14, 16 to 18, 21, 22, 25, 28-30 November, 1 -2 December 2011 (Sharp J) Woodrow v Johansson, heard 19 January 2012 (HHJ Parkes QC) Chambers v DPP, heard 8 February 2012 (Gross LJ and Irwin J) Qema v NGN Ltd heard 29 February and 1 March 2012 (Sharp J) Hunt v Times Newspapers, heard 9 and 12 March 2012 (Eady J) Bento v Chief Constable of Bedfordshire, heard 3… [read post]
22 Apr 2012, 2:17 pm
For the UKHRB’s perspective on this, see Dr Ed Bates’ recent post. [read post]
18 Apr 2012, 4:30 am
Stein v. [read post]
17 Apr 2012, 12:19 am
Austin v UK and Von Hannover v Germany (No 2) It is in this context that the cases of Austin v UK and Von Hannover (No 2) are considered, in order to argue that certain of the proposals currently being put forward are echoed in dominant themes within the judgments. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 1:20 pm
"Marbury v. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 4:26 am
Lesley Wexler (University of Illinois College of Law) has posted Litigating the Long War on Terror: The Role of Al-Aulaqi v. [read post]
20 Mar 2012, 11:28 am
Yesterday, Judge John Bates of the United States District Court for the District of Columbia granted the government’s motion for summary judgment in the case of Kadi v. [read post]
