Search for: "STATE v. KEEN"
Results 361 - 380
of 906
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Dec 2016, 4:44 pm
The last of these was R v France (Anthony) [2016] EWCA Crim 1588 (Case summary: [2016] WLR (D) 566.) [read post]
8 Dec 2016, 1:30 am
Eadie QC: yes. 15.20 Eadie QC submits that Parliament set up a legislative scheme under the 1972 Act by way that actions by the UK Government and those of other member states flow back to affect member states. [read post]
6 Dec 2016, 1:45 am
Lord Keen QC replied “yes”. 12:43 Lord Keen QC states it is clear in the relevant legislation that Parliament is sovereign. [read post]
1 Dec 2016, 8:28 am
United States ex rel. [read post]
18 Nov 2016, 7:09 pm
United States v. [read post]
16 Nov 2016, 4:00 am
The court in Pollard v BABN recommends opening up the pandora’s box of US file wrapper estoppel contrary to Free World, and seems keen to second guess the Patent Office’s acceptance of an applicant’s representations. [read post]
27 Oct 2016, 4:13 am
The Army Court of Criminal Appeals has raised an interesting question and important reminder in United States v. [read post]
29 Sep 2016, 4:46 am
EU Regulations are directly effective in all member states. [read post]
27 Sep 2016, 5:20 am
For Keen News Service, Lisa Keen previews three cases the court may consider during the upcoming term that “could have significant impact on prospects for equal protection for LGBT people. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 10:29 am
Keen v. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 4:43 am
” At Reuters, Alison Frankel suggests that next term’s Salman v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 5:32 pm
Asian countries, as well as the US, are keen to push for a longer data exclusively period. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 12:01 pm
Our fair state has long imposed peculiar—and specific—requirements for employee work breaks. [read post]
21 Sep 2016, 4:48 am
” Coverage of the recent reenactment in Philadelphia of a 1794 Supreme Court case, Georgia v. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 11:02 am
Citizens For Ceres v. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 4:59 am
The panel provided a brief reminder of the key UK and CJEU cases dealing with the meaning of (1) an act of “communication” and (2) a “public”, both in the context of re-transmission of broadcast signals (SGAE v Rafael Hotels Case C-306/05, SCF v Marco Del Corso Case C-135/10, ITV v TV Catchup Case C-607/11 and Reha Training v GEMA Case C-117/5) and P2P networks (Polydor v… [read post]
14 Sep 2016, 6:34 am
State v. [read post]
10 Aug 2016, 6:00 am
It certainly does not hurt those opposing the CRAFT BEER ATTORNEY mark that the TTAB stated in this decision, albeit a non-precedential one, that “no amount of evidence can transform a generic phrase into a registrable trademark” citing Miller Brewing Co. v. [read post]
3 Aug 2016, 9:06 am
” In stating its position on what “likely to cause substantial injury” meant, the FTC ruled that they must take into account not just the likelihood that the harm will occur, but also the magnitude of the harm. [read post]
28 Jul 2016, 12:12 pm
State of Gujarat, AIR 1968 Guj 252], and later extended to acts displayed ‘sexual perversity’ [Fazal Rab Shoudhary v. [read post]
