Search for: "STATE v. LOPEZ"
Results 361 - 380
of 1,584
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Sep 2017, 8:53 am
Lopez, U.S. [read post]
7 Sep 2017, 10:18 am
Jurisdiction CRS is a Florida company whose principal office is in that state, and MacDonald is a Texas company whose principal office is in this state. [read post]
3 Sep 2017, 7:26 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Aug 2017, 9:53 am
Applying the framework from the recent en banc decision in United States v. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 4:20 am
Soto-Lopez, 476 U.S. 898, 903 (1986) (“A state law implicates the right to travel . . . when it uses ‘any classification which serves to penalize the exercise of that right.'” (quoting Dunn v. [read post]
4 Aug 2017, 4:20 am
Soto-Lopez, 476 U.S. 898, 903 (1986) (“A state law implicates the right to travel . . . when it uses ‘any classification which serves to penalize the exercise of that right.'” (quoting Dunn v. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 10:07 am
Lopez v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 7:37 am
’ (United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 6:04 am
United States v. [read post]
28 Jul 2017, 11:00 am
United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2017, 8:01 am
Lopez (Cal. [read post]
16 Jul 2017, 11:00 am
(Hint: The answer ain’t stacked misdemeanors).United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2017, 2:06 pm
Grant v. [read post]
9 Jul 2017, 12:39 pm
United States v. [read post]
5 Jul 2017, 5:22 pm
State v. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 7:09 am
Here is a recap of June’s filings: Lopez, et al. v. [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 12:02 pm
Ashcroft (9-0 decision rejecting expansive application of the aggravated felony definition to cover driving under the influence); Lopez v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 10:52 am
In Trinity Lutheran v. [read post]
25 Jun 2017, 2:53 pm
United States v. [read post]
24 Jun 2017, 2:58 am
Another difficult question came from Justice Paloma Lopez-St. [read post]