Search for: "STRANGE v. STATE" Results 361 - 380 of 2,233
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Feb 2024, 9:52 am by Marty Lederman
  And strangely, Part II-A of Professor Tillman’s brief devotes six pages to arguing (mistakenly) that “[i]n the Constitution of 1788, the President did not hold an ‘Office … under the United States,'” without arguing that the same is true in Section 3 of the Fourteenth Amendment—let alone that the alleged limited meaning of that phrase in 1788 is a reason for reversing the Colorado Supreme Court.) [read post]
28 Sep 2022, 8:42 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
Such is the case with the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals’s recent ruling in NetChoice v. [read post]
29 Nov 2012, 9:38 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
The case raises a strange issue of how to assess whether the damages are too high under state law.The case is Saladino v. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 6:49 am
State, 18 So.3d 1246, 1247 (Fla. 2d DCA 2009) (citing State v. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 9:00 pm by Austin Sarat
By strange coincidence, 2022 is a major anniversary of three Supreme Court decisions about America’s most extreme punishments: the death penalty and life imprisonment without parole (LWOP).Fifty years ago, the Court’s Furman v. [read post]
22 Nov 2013, 4:30 am by Karen Tani
Hargraves and Title IX   Book Session: Doctors and Demonstrators: How Political Institutions Shape Abortion Law in the United States, Britain and Canada, by Drew Halfmann  Ziad Munson -- DiscussantZakiya Luna -- DiscussantDrew Halfmann -- Creator, Organizer, AuthorIsaac Martin -- Chair, DiscussantDrew Halfmann  -- Author Southern Law  Tamara Myers -- Network Rep, Creator, OrganizerBarry Godfrey -- Chair, DiscussantMegan Francis, The Strange Fruit of the… [read post]
29 May 2014, 1:33 am by Jon Gelman
The gravest threat today to public-employee unions—which represent cops, firefighters, prison guards, teachers, nurses, and other city and state workers—is a Supreme Court case named Harris v. [read post]
13 Jan 2012, 9:19 am by nflatow
This is a strange argument in the context of the ministerial exception. [read post]