Search for: "Samples v. State"
Results 361 - 380
of 4,546
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 Jul 2011, 11:26 pm
As I understand it, this was a report on a crime scene sample referred to Cellmark by the Illinois State Police. [read post]
6 Mar 2021, 11:32 am
We were involved in a case before the New Jersey Supreme Court in 2008, State v. [read post]
3 Oct 2012, 2:40 pm
In Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
24 Apr 2012, 2:33 pm
State here. [read post]
10 Mar 2011, 8:54 pm
In a case decided on March 7, 2011, Skinner v. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 3:17 pm
Code §192 - Refusal of witness to testify or produce papersUnited States v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 6:00 am
Auth. v Transport Workers' Union of Am., Local 100 AFL-CIO, 6 NY3d 332*; 2. [read post]
7 Jun 2022, 3:17 pm
Code §192 - Refusal of witness to testify or produce papersUnited States v. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 2:55 pm
REFERENCES & SUPPLEMENTAL MATERIALS: Vote for Stay Tuned with Preet, Webby AwardsUnited States v. [read post]
15 May 2023, 6:00 am
Auth. v Transport Workers' Union of Am., Local 100 AFL-CIO, 6 NY3d 332*; 2. [read post]
14 Jul 2009, 9:36 am
We have provided some sample language for New York State purchasers to read and understand. [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 7:12 am
In State v. [read post]
13 Mar 2008, 3:17 pm
Olivas, 122 Wn.2d 73, 83, 856 P.2d 1076 (1993); State v. [read post]
1 Dec 2012, 9:08 am
In Cantrell v. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 6:56 am
Since many states permit the three types of "blood samples" to be used interchangeably in blood-alcohol analysis, counsel should certainly determine which type was actually used.A simple technique for visually demonstrating the concept of testing blood that has aged and been subject to possible fermentation is to bring in a fresh vial of blood and compare it to the evidentiary sample withdrawn months earlier from the defendant. [read post]
5 Mar 2012, 7:20 am
For legal case decisions, see Commonwealth v. [read post]
17 Jan 2009, 9:42 am
The Supreme Court's recent decision in State v. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 3:40 pm
Maryland v King, United States Supreme Court (6/3/13)Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Criminal LawAfter his arrest on first- and second-degree assault charges, King was processed through a Wicomico County, Maryland, facility, where personnel used a cheek swab to take a DNA sample pursuant to the Maryland DNA Collection Act (Act), which authorizes officers to collect DNA samples from persons charged with violent crimes. [read post]
2 Dec 2010, 8:25 am
In State v. [read post]
5 Jul 2018, 5:32 pm
R. v. [read post]
