Search for: "Say v. Baker" Results 361 - 380 of 1,402
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
19 Aug 2020, 12:40 am by Sophie Corke
This argument was rejected in favour of tackling each separate objection to the claim language step-by-step.Trade MarksGuestKat Nedim Malovic reported on a recent decision of the High Court of Justice of England and Wales, which held that the shape of Land Rover Defender cars cannot benefit from trade mark protection, bearing neither inherent nor acquired distinctiveness.OtherFormer GuestKat Laetitia Lagarde (Baker McKenzie) pointed to a number of ways in which IP lawyers are well-placed to… [read post]
13 Jan 2008, 10:40 am
  Baker referred to "persuasive" precedent from the 4th Circuit, Veney v. [read post]
20 Nov 2011, 10:32 am by Stewart Baker
(Stewart Baker) Why is there so much bad privacy law, and so many privacy victims? [read post]
25 Aug 2018, 7:40 am by Ilya Somin
On the other hand, much recent Supreme Court doctrine says that state laws motivated by bias violate the equal protection of the laws. [read post]
5 May 2014, 4:09 am by SHG
Finally, I agree with Stewart Baker that the line-drawing problem once you reject Smith v. [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 12:01 pm by Ilya Somin
Texas (2003), the reversal of numerous pre-New Deal cases protecting economic liberties and property rights, and the reversal of Baker v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 6:49 am
Florida and Sullivan v. [read post]
1 Aug 2017, 11:13 am
 But a different opinion, from now, holds that the agreement is binding in such circumstances.It's a statutory interpretation case, and revolves around the meaning of what the statute means when it says that "[o]nce signed, such a contract governs all subsequent open-book account transactions for medical services for which the contract was signed until or unless rescinded by written notice within 30 days of signature. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:23 am
  Some might answer "no", but they likely play a role in shaping public opinion, Mike says. * Kiddee case evades Trunki's horned animalDavid pens about the UK Supreme Court's judgment in the famous Trunki case, ie PMS International Limited v Magmatic Limited [2016] UKSC 12. [read post]
12 Oct 2015, 12:11 pm
Then, and now, the issue of enhancing biodiversity remains a highly contentious one, he says.* Do you need permission to link? [read post]
30 Apr 2012, 8:50 am by zrojas
As cited in the Park Place Estates case referenced above, and citing to Baker v. [read post]
2 Jul 2011, 12:20 am by Mike
But the district judge refused, saying that the 96 hours had expired months ago. [read post]
2 Jul 2011, 12:20 am by Mike
But the district judge refused, saying that the 96 hours had expired months ago. [read post]