Search for: "Scott v. Jones"
Results 361 - 380
of 387
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Aug 2007, 5:09 am
After being appointed on Wednesday to represent Jordan Scott, the public defender Brian Jones told the presiding judge that he could not start trial on Thursday because, well, he’d had less than 24 hours to prepare for trial. [read post]
5 Jul 2007, 7:12 am
Frye, The Peculiar Story of United States v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 9:41 am
Scott Dodson, In Search of Removal Jurisdiction, Northw [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 11:26 am
Jones v. [read post]
24 May 2007, 10:40 am
Eddins & Lee Bus Sales, Inc., 491 So.2d 942, 944 (Ala. 1986); Jones v. [read post]
13 May 2007, 11:44 pm
Jones, DEBT OR EQUITY? [read post]
11 May 2007, 6:10 am
No. 3566 at para. 7 and Lerner J. in Jones, Gable & Co. v. [read post]
7 May 2007, 9:54 am
Dru Stevenson, Special Solicitude for States: Massachusetts v. [read post]
30 Apr 2007, 9:54 am
Dru Stevenson, Special Solicitude for States: Massachusetts v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 4:17 pm
The following commentary is by Bonnie Scott Jones, a senior attorney at the Center for Reproductive Rights. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 1:53 pm
Code § 22-1321 (2001); Scott v. [read post]
18 Apr 2007, 6:53 am
Here's what we had on the blog regarding today's opinions and arguments: The Opinions: - Lyle has this commentary on the consequences of today's opinion in the abortion cases; - *NEW: 6:21 PM: The commentary of Bonnie Scott Jones of the Center for Reproductive Rights can be found here; and - *NEW 7:30 PM: Comments from Paul Benjamin Linton of the Thomas More Society are now posted here. - Lyle also has this post (updated as of 3:30 p.m.) summarizing the opinion at… [read post]
15 Apr 2007, 11:51 pm
Rhonda will present the various ways Factiva and Dow Jones Product & Services. [read post]
13 Apr 2007, 12:12 pm
Instead, he concluded that the Respondent's unilateral action was unlawful because the Respondent hired a workforce consisting solely of its predecessor's Union-represented employees and that the Respondent was a "perfectly clear" successor within the meaning of NLRB v. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 11:13 pm
But one state judge held in September 2006 that it was unconstitutional, asserting in Graham v. [read post]
11 Mar 2007, 3:17 am
His office will alleviate that.Via Scott at Ohio Death Penalty Information, Jeffrey Rosen has this article in the New York Times Sunday Magazine, entitled "The Brain on the Stand," providing a detailed overview of the profound impact rapidly-evolving developments in neuroscience may have on modern criminal law.Excerpts:...The extent of that revolution is hotly debated, but the influence of what some call neurolaw is clearly growing. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 1:48 pm
Mauro also has this post at The BLT on the 150th anniversary of the Court's opinion in Scott v. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 9:01 am
That is a reasonable way of summing up Monday's argument in the case of Scott v. [read post]
24 Feb 2007, 3:05 pm
Scott v. [read post]
21 Feb 2007, 10:39 am
Scott. [read post]
