Search for: "Selective Insurance Company v. Goings"
Results 361 - 380
of 520
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Oct 2011, 10:23 am
Sport of Kings suits (28%) (big co v. big co) [read post]
20 Oct 2011, 12:53 am
AXA General Insurance Ltd & Ors v Lord Ad [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 8:59 am
The Texas Supreme Court issued an opinion in 1994, in the case, Celtic Life Insurance Company v. [read post]
12 Sep 2011, 3:35 am
Here is Think IP Strategy’s weekly selection of top intellectual property news breaking in the blogosphere and internet. [read post]
9 Sep 2011, 6:51 am
Co. v. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 3:37 pm
Even assuming that more companies begin to adopt arbitration clauses similar to the one used by AT&T Mobility, the long-term impact of Concepcion may simply be to shift the focus of consumer class action litigation in the United States to other industries, such as insurance, to which the Federal Arbitration Act does not apply, or to situations in which companies have not interfaced directly with consumers and therefore have no arbitration agreement to enforce. [read post]
25 Aug 2011, 10:42 pm
Decision #1: Connecticut Supreme Court This morning my friends over at Abnormal Use beat me to a description of the most interesting recent case addressing malfunction theory, Metropolitan Property & Casualty Insurance Company v. [read post]
19 Aug 2011, 12:01 am
Hewlett-Packard Company, et. al. [read post]
18 Aug 2011, 4:10 pm
For instance, one might conclude that a mining company should be strictly liable for all damage that its blasting does to neighboring properties — because it bears the profit from the mining and should thus also bear the loss — even though the mining company isn’t morally culpable for blasting.B. [read post]
13 Aug 2011, 3:24 pm
” Gonzales v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 10:07 am
Going forward, I wonder if online terms will become even more one-sided--since companies have greater assurances that arbitration clauses will be enforced, will this cause them to load up agreements with more onerous terms? [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 10:34 am
All installments in this series are collected in the Rakofsky v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 10:34 am
All installments in this series are collected in the Rakofsky v. [read post]
5 Aug 2011, 10:34 am
All installments in this series are collected in the Rakofsky v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 3:30 pm
Finally, people lack insurance because businesses choose not to offer it to their employees, insurance companies decline to extend it for pre-existing conditions, and people refuse to select it and pay for it – some out of choice, some because they cannot afford it. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 5:41 am
Read broadly, the decision strikes a blow to the ability of consumers to bring suits against companies, both inside and outside of arbitration. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 4:34 am
Last week the Fourth District Court of Appeal reinstated a $4.9 million dollar jury verdict against State Farm Insurance Company in a UM case that had been set aside by the trial judge on the grounds of “juror non-disclosure” about the juror’s prior litigation history. [read post]
27 Jul 2011, 4:37 am
See McZeal v. [read post]
18 Jun 2011, 7:23 am
The insurance company will pay for defense costs but they get to chose who the lawyers are going to be. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 11:30 pm
The Justices are not going to see the error of their ways and change their minds. [read post]
