Search for: "Self v. Self" Results 361 - 380 of 19,531
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Feb 2012, 10:39 am
The IPKat notes that Glenn Mulcaire sought to avoid giving evidence relying, inter alia, on the privilege against self-incrimination (PSI). [read post]
8 Aug 2008, 5:05 am
Cavo (Cornell Law School) has posted Weissman v. [read post]
28 May 2010, 2:28 am by traceydennis
Craftrule Ltd v 41-60 Albert Palace Mansions (Freehold) Ltd [2010] EWHC 1230 (Ch); [2010] WLR (D) 138 “The phrase ‘a self-contained part of a building’ in ss 3 and 4 of the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 did not, either expressly or by implication, require that a self-contained part of a building should be indivisible into smaller such parts. [read post]
28 Feb 2011, 2:05 am by sally
41–60 Albert Palace Mansions (Freehold) Ltd v Craftrule Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 185; [2011] WLR (D) 62 “The meaning of the words ‘a self-contained … part of a building’ in section 3 of the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 was clear and there was nothing in the section to suggest that the right to enfranchisement attached only to the smallest possible self-contained part of a building. [read post]
2 Jun 2010, 2:26 am by sally
Craftrule Ltd v 41-60 Albert Palace Mansions (Freehold) Ltd [2010] EWHC 1230 (Ch); [2010] WLR (D) 138 “The phrase ‘a self-contained part of a building’ in ss 3 and 4 of the Leasehold Reform, Housing and Urban Development Act 1993 did not, either expressly or by implication, require that a self-contained part of a building should be indivisible into smaller such parts. [read post]
23 Apr 2012, 1:50 pm by David
David Cassuto The Shameless Self Promotion Desk is back! [read post]