Search for: "Shoe Show, Inc." Results 361 - 380 of 518
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Sep 2011, 4:00 am by Terry Hart
Like Puerto 80, Napster stood in the shoes of its users and argued against a proposed preliminary injunction because it “would silence the entire Napster community, violating not only Napster’s free speech rights, but those of its users as well. [read post]
8 Sep 2011, 4:17 pm by Mandelman
In exchange for the their business, companies such as Citigroup Inc, Wells Fargo & Co, SunTrust Banks Inc. and Countrywide allegedly required reinsurance partnerships on generous terms that violated the Real Estate Settlement Procedures Act, a 1974 law prohibiting abusive home sales practices. [read post]
2 Sep 2011, 1:44 pm by Bexis
  In essence, a proper preliminary showing would shift the usual regulatory burden of proof post-approval. [read post]
6 Jul 2011, 11:23 am by Bexis
Mast Biosurgery USA Inc., ___ F.3d ___, 2011 WL 2566426 (11th Cir. [read post]
14 Jun 2011, 7:17 am by Richard Alderman
" Hence, the plaintiff, which merely stepped into the shoes of MERS, its  assignor, and gained only that to which its assignor was entitled (see Matter of International Ribbon Mills, 36 N.Y.2d 121, 126;  see also U.C.C. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 12:43 pm by Jenna Greene
Imbroscio stressed that “We’re not selling shoes here... diabetes is a public health crisis. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 8:26 am by Thom Lambert
  Elhauge argues (incorrectly, as I show in this article) that this is an anticompetitive effect. [read post]