Search for: "Sides v. Beene"
Results 361 - 380
of 25,393
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Oct 2016, 9:40 am
Meuser v. [read post]
10 Jan 2019, 1:00 am
Majority Decision By a vote of 7-2, the Supreme Court sided with the students. [read post]
9 Apr 2010, 6:00 am
” Akinola v. [read post]
22 Mar 2007, 2:28 am
US v. rendon-Duarte, No. 06-30200 (3-21-07). [read post]
2 May 2011, 5:00 am
Since last Wednesday the legal blogosphere has been busily abuzz about AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
18 Jan 2011, 5:00 am
Briefs have already been filed by the Business Roundtable/Chamber, ICI and the State of Delaware (more on that later). [read post]
3 Jan 2011, 4:30 am
After all, these standards had not been revised since 1982. [read post]
24 May 2013, 1:00 pm
So that's bad precedent for Safeway, lost money on their own attorney's, and a cost award -- likely including the other side's attorney fees -- against them. [read post]
19 Apr 2010, 11:13 am
The same is true for the kind of deal at issue in SEC v. [read post]
27 Jun 2007, 3:15 pm
Well, it's been a very interesting couple weeks of baseball as the Court's key switch hitter continued to swing from the right side of the plate. [read post]
2 Jul 2008, 4:42 pm
And would have added a bit more on the doctrinal side as well.Nonetheless, I think that Judge Wardlaw is exactly right that a defendant can be found liable for insider trading even if s/he is a relative outsider to the transaction; for example, as here, was on the Board of a company who was informed of a potential acquisition because the company was a significant investor whose approval would have been needed for the transaction. [read post]
23 Oct 2016, 7:51 am
In the recent case of Murphy v. [read post]
24 Jun 2018, 6:29 pm
In Bank of New York Mellon v. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 1:30 am
Kavanaugh siding with the Court’s “liberal” block. [read post]
A Court-Side Seat: A Poultry Defense, a Houston Highway and a CERCLA Consent Decree that Won’t Budge
3 Mar 2021, 7:31 am
Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Luminant Generation v. [read post]
29 Dec 2015, 6:13 am
McKale v. [read post]
15 Dec 2007, 12:57 pm
One is this: if what prosecutors say is true -- and let us remember we have only heard one side of the story so far -- what went on with the Jones v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 11:55 am
Someone at Westlaw must have been screwing around. [read post]
13 Mar 2012, 4:08 am
There was a reasonable certainty that the defendant just crossed the border for the extended border search doctrine where he was seen near the border after having literally been seen on the Mexican side of the border shortly before that. [read post]
17 Dec 2013, 11:57 pm
[v] (The apparent search for pockets is reflected in the naming of third parties as well. [read post]
