Search for: "Slate v State" Results 361 - 380 of 2,189
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Nov 2011, 6:42 am by Joshua Matz
Today, the Court will hear oral argument in United States v. [read post]
19 Jan 2011, 7:03 am by Conor McEvily
Yesterday’s oral argument in The Boeing Company v. [read post]
3 Nov 2011, 8:45 am by Gritsforbreakfast
" So it's possible this case may be decided in favor of the state without causing too much damage. [read post]
28 Aug 2023, 4:00 am by Howard Friedman
, (49(1) Monash University Law Review (2023)).Dov Fox & Jill Wieber Lens, Texas Says a Fetus Is a Child, Except When a Parent Sues a Negligent Doctor or State Official, (Slate (online), August 23, 2023).Zainuddin Zainuddin, Salle Salle & Andi Risma, Balanced Justice in Islamic Inheritance to Realize Unity and Sustainability of Collective Life, (August 13, 2023).From SmartCILP:Wilson Huhn, Analysis of Carson v. [read post]
16 Jun 2017, 9:30 pm by Karen Tani
Mencken’s constitution.Al Brophy (UNC Law) has posted some thoughts on the famous case State v. [read post]
30 Jun 2017, 10:26 pm
" And in commentary, online at Slate, Mark Joseph Stern has a jurisprudence essay titled "Texas Messes With Marriage Equality: The state Supreme Court's refusal to extend state spousal benefits to same-sex couples is an insidious attempt to defy Obergefell v. [read post]
1 Oct 2021, 5:59 am by Michael C. Dorf
Section 5 says that if a state meets the deadline, then no challenge to its slate will be entertained. [read post]
6 May 2014, 2:05 pm by Christopher Lund
The Supreme Court yesterday decided Town of Greece v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 8:28 am by Charles Kotuby
The Supreme Court of the United States heard argument in Abbott v. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 8:00 am by Amanda Rice
United States, the Armed Career Criminal Act case. [read post]
23 Jul 2021, 5:28 am by James Romoser
Here’s the Friday morning read: Mississippi Asks Supreme Court to End Roe v. [read post]
11 Jul 2019, 8:00 am by Kevin Kaufman
Supreme Court’s decision in South Dakota v. [read post]