Search for: "Smith v. Davis"
Results 361 - 380
of 763
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2011, 4:32 pm
Davis v. [read post]
5 Aug 2021, 1:50 pm
State v. [read post]
15 Aug 2007, 6:12 am
AdvanceMe Inc v. [read post]
9 Apr 2015, 5:00 am
Davis v. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 1:00 pm
The court’s decision in Fulton v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 1:00 pm
Davis, Acting Warden of San Quentin State Prison, Nos. 09-99012, 09-99013 (Ikuta with NR Smith and Murguia) --- Finding that a reasoned opinion of the California Supreme Court regarding a California death-row prisoner's claim of penalty-phase ineffective assistance was entitled to deference under AEDPA, the panel reversed the district court's grant of relief from a death sentence. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 7:47 am
At Alison Frankel’s On the Case blog for Thomson Reuters News & Insight, Erin Geiger Smith reports on stalled progress of efforts by legislators to roll back the Court’s ruling in AT&T Mobility v. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 9:56 am
See also Davis v. [read post]
31 Dec 2013, 10:01 am
App. 1999); Smith v. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 9:05 pm
Supreme Court next term of Securities and Exchange Commission v. [read post]
4 Jun 2019, 9:30 pm
We asked the 2018-19 Davis Fellows the following question: how has your time at the Davis Center led to new insights about the reach and limits of law and legalities? [read post]
12 Aug 2012, 9:41 am
Smith and DJ Wolle. [read post]
12 May 2013, 6:05 am
Jonathan V. [read post]
16 Jun 2019, 4:58 am
Clapp, James Dahlgren, Devra Lee Davis, Malin Roy Dollinger, Brian G. [read post]
2 Jan 2023, 2:50 pm
Smith had been a rival to John C. [read post]
5 Apr 2010, 6:20 pm
From this week’s edition: Leading off this edition is the Supreme Court’s sweeping, albeit noncapital, decision in Padilla v. [read post]
11 Aug 2014, 7:29 am
Davis, 427 F.3d 197, 212 n.14 (3rd Cir.2005) (“[V]ideotaping or photographing the police in the performance of their duties on public property may be protected activit[ies]”); Smith v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 5:52 am
Parke, Davis & Co., 256 F.3d 1013, 1021 (10th Cir. 2001) (wrong to “construe [a treater’s] ‘heeding’ an adequate warning to mean [s/he] would have given the warning”) (applying Oklahoma law); In re Diet Drug Litigation, 895 A.2d 480, 490-91 (N.J. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 6:36 am
Davis, 2023-NCCOA-4, ___ N.C. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 8:51 am
Smith & Nephew Richards, Inc., 1999 WL 811334, at *24 (Tex. [read post]