Search for: "Smith v. Grant et al"
Results 361 - 380
of 495
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Feb 2010, 9:16 am
To grant a Texas death-row inmate relief on his subsequent Penry I and Penry II claim under the recently decided Tennard, Smith, et al. cases, we must find that those decisions announced new law, but the federal courts cannot grant relief on those very same claims unless they find that Texas courts misapplied clearly established law at the time of the relevant state-court decision. [read post]
19 Feb 2010, 6:12 pm
" The decision in Adar, et al v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 2:20 pm
Opinion below (Federal Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition Petitioner’s reply Title: Smith v. [read post]
15 Feb 2010, 4:04 am
Powerscreen International Distribution Limited et al. [read post]
14 Feb 2010, 2:36 pm
Prof. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 7:57 pm
SunTrust Bank, et al (2D08-1239), the Second District granted a petition for certiorari and reversed a trial court order that required the petitioners submit to DNA testing. [read post]
1 Feb 2010, 3:04 am
Eugene Volokh discusses religious exemptions of a different type, from mandatory autopsies for executed killers in Johnson v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 3:51 am
(EPLAW) The Hague District Court: Ex parte injunction granted: Street Surfing LLC v. [read post]
15 Jan 2010, 7:39 am
Geico, case number 08-7146, and Christine Lindsay et. al. v. [read post]
23 Dec 2009, 9:28 am
A case study, or even data gleaned from briefs filed in school speech cases, would have been helpful to a reader seeking to gauge the size of the costs schools bear as a result of Tinker et al. [read post]
19 Dec 2009, 1:58 am
Walgreens et al (CAFC 2009-1237) precedential Judge DYK penned this opinion, with which Judge Bryson concurred. [read post]
16 Dec 2009, 3:40 am
Schiff et al. v. [read post]
12 Dec 2009, 7:08 am
Cosgrove et al., Phila, July Term, 2008, no. 3708 (request to sever UIM claim and third party claim denied). [read post]
2 Dec 2009, 10:54 am
On Monday, the US Supreme Court granted certiorari in the case of Morrison, et al., v. [read post]
20 Nov 2009, 9:25 am
But by granting the motion for rehearing, the Court has given itself more time to think about the issues. 3 Improvident grant: Aggie bonfire case Zachry Construction Corp., et al. v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 4:53 pm
Chief Justice Jefferson delivered the opinion of the Court.FEE RECOVERY LIMITED Smith v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 10:00 am
Roberts, et al., Respondents, vTishman Speyer Properties, L.P., et al., Appellants. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 8:49 am
PARKER et al. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 1:49 pm
Department of the Interior et al. v. [read post]
5 Oct 2009, 7:42 am
Smith, et al. (08-351), have had hearings on the question of forfeiting their property used in a drug crime, or have had their property returned, and, if so, “the potential significance of those facts” on the question of mootness. [read post]
