Search for: "Smith v. United States Department of Justice" Results 361 - 380 of 775
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Aug 2018, 4:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
[Smith v Hager, 185 A.D.2d 612]Demoting an employee for sleeping on duty on two occasions, although a hearing officer found the employee’s supervisor had “condoned” such conduct and the hearing officer had recommended a suspension without pay for three weeks. [read post]
19 Mar 2019, 7:24 am by Katherine Kelley
Like the original Brookings report, I collected data on sextortion occurring both within and outside of the United States. [read post]
25 Jul 2018, 9:01 pm by Dan Flynn
Both the federal trial and appellate cases in United States v. [read post]
25 Jun 2018, 5:39 pm by John Elwood
Hyatt, 17-1299, and Nevada Department of Wildlife v. [read post]
2 Apr 2014, 9:58 am
District Court for the District of Columbia:  In re Application of the United States of America for Nondisclosure Order, 2014 WL 1273227 (2014) (“In re Application, supra”). [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 6:09 am
Supp. 3d 196 (S.D.N.Y. 2015) – to the extent that’s even possible under United States v. [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 9:27 am by Wells Bennett
Klayman tells the panel that he doesn’t trust the United States’ explanation for his clie [read post]
19 May 2019, 4:15 pm by INFORRM
United States CNN reports that Stormy Daniels has reached a settlement with Michael Cohen and Keith Davidson, her former attorney, in her lawsuit that accused both men of working together to protect President Donald Trump. [read post]
21 Jun 2023, 8:15 am by Eric Columbus
Under the statute, this responsibility is left solely to the President of the United States. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 12:25 am by INFORRM
The biggest story in the world this week was of course the election of Donald Trump as the next President of the United States. [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 11:08 am by John Elwood
§ 841(a)(l) as defined in United States v. [read post]
1 Jul 2024, 3:11 pm by John Elwood
§ 922(g), which the court was holding for United States v. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 9:02 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Last week, the Department of Justice asked the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit to refrain from taking any further action in the leading case challenging President Trump’s already infamous Executive Order (EO) 13769, which temporarily banned entry into the country by nationals of seven predominantly Muslim countries and all refugees, while indefinitely banning entry of Syrian refugees. [read post]
30 Sep 2009, 6:19 am
" One of the petitions considered on Tuesday addresses the issue of whether federal judges have the power to release detainees into the United States. [read post]