Search for: "Smith v. Vice"
Results 361 - 380
of 458
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
22 Mar 2021, 7:45 am
United States v. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 9:59 am
Meanwhile, the IPKat's friend, dynamic small London-based practitioner Shireen Smith (Azrights) is offering an employment opportunity. [read post]
3 Oct 2013, 10:43 am
Linda Greenhouse of the New York Times writes about the oral arguments in Bahlul v. [read post]
18 Oct 2021, 7:22 am
"[17] [V.] [read post]
4 Aug 2019, 1:26 pm
Thanks to the New York Times and Matt Richtel for “Tainted Pork, Ill Consumers and an Investigation Thwarted. [read post]
12 Feb 2011, 7:28 am
Relatedly, compare the treatment of imitative trade dress to “compare to Brand X” messages—courts are not suspicious of the latter on trademark grounds and haven’t been since Smith v. [read post]
Symposium: The Supreme Court recognizes but limits disparate impact in its Fair Housing Act decision
26 Jun 2015, 5:58 am
Duke Power Co. and Smith v. [read post]
5 Aug 2018, 9:01 pm
Indeed, one of the cases Rumsey cites on how to apply stare decisis, Smith v. [read post]
16 Aug 2008, 2:43 am
– discussion of Washington Post article on Ismed’s efforts to promote follow-on biologics approval pathway: (Patent Baristas), (Patent Docs), US: Congressional fact-finding on follow-on biologics: (Patent Docs), US: David v Monsanto: Biotechnology patent ‘exhaustion’ after Quanta, Supreme Court petition: (Hal Wegner), US: Ulysses Pharmaceuticals announces issuance of patent for novel class of ant [read post]
15 Apr 2010, 11:56 am
Monday, the Supreme Court will hear one hour of oral argument in Christian Legal Society v. [read post]
5 Apr 2012, 9:14 am
In West v. [read post]
24 Sep 2021, 7:27 am
V. [read post]
10 Jul 2017, 8:02 am
KNAPIK, PLAINTIFF, V. [read post]
22 Jan 2007, 6:22 pm
"These policy changes will facilitate further research and discovery in a very exciting area of life sciences," said James Severson, vice provost of intellectual property and technology transfer at University of Washington. [read post]
16 Feb 2021, 8:49 am
I will largely leave to others prescriptions about what is to be done; but I hope my analysis might help us think through such matters. [1] See, e.g., Doe v. [read post]
9 Dec 2008, 7:58 am
The chat touched on the then-pending obscenity case Miller v. [read post]
17 Oct 2011, 5:57 pm
Coffee discussed dueling class actions and the ruling in Smith v. [read post]
22 Sep 2009, 11:00 am
Accordingly, assuming, without deciding, that Senator Skelos presently has standing to sue the Governor, we now proceed to the merits (see Matter of New York State Assn. of Criminal Defense Lawyers v Kaye, 96 NY2d 512, 516 [2001]; Babigian v Wachtler, 69 NY2d 1012, 1013 [1987]; Matter of Roman Catholic Diocese of Albany v New York State Dept. of Health, 66 NY2d 948, 951 [1985]). [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 3:31 pm
Smith, 2 Ir. [read post]
