Search for: "Spelling v. State"
Results 361 - 380
of 2,445
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Oct 2020, 4:10 pm
He stated that: “It is not possible to spell out such a right [on the part of Tesco] from the fact that the Article 6 guarantee of a public trial of criminal charges is qualified by the proviso that the Court “may” withhold information from the public where “strictly necessary” in the interests of justice” ([35]). [read post]
19 Oct 2020, 4:19 am
The enactment of BCL 1104-a could have spelled the demise of a viable claim for corporate dissolution based upon common-law principles. [read post]
16 Oct 2020, 9:11 am
O’Lone v. [read post]
15 Oct 2020, 8:23 am
Jude Medical, LLC v. [read post]
13 Oct 2020, 9:05 pm
After a detailed review of juror testimony, the court found that “[v]iewing the totality of the circumstances, the court finds that there is no indication that any juror concealed harbored bias from the court or the defendants. . . [read post]
12 Oct 2020, 8:06 am
” She went to accelerated learning classes, chess tournaments, and spelling bees. [read post]
7 Oct 2020, 9:01 pm
True, the case that spelled the end of the discriminatory Defense of Marriage Act (U.S. v. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 9:06 am
In the 1986 case Moore v. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 2:00 am
Moritz v Universal City Studios (California Court of Appeal, Second Appellate District, 9/2/20). [read post]
18 Sep 2020, 12:30 pm
Also, a soft circuit-split: the Sixth Circuit breaks with the Eleventh in electing to spell Anderson v. [read post]
16 Sep 2020, 6:30 am
Will he lead the “transformation” that the United States desperately needs? [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 11:32 am
In a memorandum from Mitnick to Nielsen, Mitnick wrote: “Pursuant to your authority set forth in section 113 of title 6, United States Code, you have expressed your desire to designate certain officers of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) in order of succession to serve as Acting Secretary. [read post]
9 Sep 2020, 9:40 am
Which -- not coincidentally -- is partly why that's precisely what every single state but two in fact do.I don't doubt that Boies and his colleagues wrote a great brief. [read post]
4 Sep 2020, 5:05 pm
As we head into a hot holiday weekend, here are some appellate items to explore:Today's DJ has Justice Moore's piece on Jackie Robinson, United States v. 2LT Jack R Robinson as well as Marc Alexander's book review: Notorious RBG Talks Life, Love, Liberty, and LawThe Recorder's On Appeals column has Katy Graham's The Far-Reaching Effects of a Landmark Decision on the Standard of Appellate Review for Clear and Convincing Evidence.Tuesday's… [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 3:51 am
irketi v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 6:00 am
Buchta v. [read post]
25 Aug 2020, 6:17 pm
As the complaint spells out, they have submitted a great deal of information and documentation in hopes of persuading CFIUS not to order divestiture. [read post]
21 Aug 2020, 9:42 am
Crum spelled out his arguments in a recent blog post at Take Care. [read post]
14 Aug 2020, 12:32 pm
Volokh also wrote that the Supreme Court’s United States v. [read post]
13 Aug 2020, 1:55 am
States have not always done a good job of spelling out what is meant by “convenience,” but generally the only exceptions are for when an employee’s work legitimately could not be carried out in the employer’s state. [read post]
