Search for: "Stanford Trust Company" Results 361 - 380 of 402
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jul 2009, 2:37 am
Moores and Rebecca Ann Mores as individuals and as trustees of the John and Rebecca Ann Moores Family Trust. [read post]
1 Jul 2009, 11:01 pm
Allen Stanford and Bernard Madoff reflects that no such soul-searching is likely to emerge anytime soon down on Texas Avenue. [read post]
27 Jun 2009, 5:40 pm
Representing investors who have been defrauded by brokerage firms, investment advisors, banks, hedge funds and trust companies is a very specialized practice area. [read post]
17 Jun 2009, 2:11 pm
http://www.theadvertiser.com/article/20090617/NEWS01/906170327/1002/NEWS01/Fraud-allegations-mount--Louisiana-s-attorney-general-targets-The-Stanford-Group--voice-your-opinion-nowJeff Moore • jeffmoore@theadvertiser.com • June 17, 2009 State launches criminal probe of company linked to pyramid schemeLocal investors who lost money to The Stanford Group could help build a criminal case… [read post]
27 May 2009, 7:00 am
Methenitis also is the author of Law of the Game, a blog that discusses video game law, so, we, you know, trust him. [read post]
30 Apr 2009, 1:08 am
I have been reading a post in New Worlds Notes about Fred Von Lohmann’s presentation on copyright in virtual worlds for the Play Machinima symposium at Stanford. [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 11:01 pm
Most recently, Steffy wrote this column in which he compares Sir Allen Stanford of the beleaguered Stanford Financial Group to former Enron executives, Ken Lay and Jeff Skilling: All this finger pointing should bring a strong sense of déjà vu to Houstonians, who watched Enron’s meteoric rise and fall, as well as the unsuccessful efforts of the late company chairman Ken Lay and CEO Jeff Skilling to plead ignorance of the… [read post]
28 Apr 2009, 10:41 am
Lawyers need to trust that the resources they use are accurate, and if publishers betray that trust, will they be able to continue to command the high prices they are getting now? [read post]
13 Apr 2009, 1:38 pm
Allen Stanford, two of his top aides and three of his companies are accused by the U.S. [read post]
5 Apr 2009, 1:26 pm
”[2] The plan provides for the establishment of a Financial Stability Trust, a Public-Private Investment Fund designed to “cleanse” financial institutions’ balance sheets of legacy assets, and initiatives to support loan securitization and community lending while preventing foreclosures.[3] The Financial Stability Plan also promises to impose accountability and transparency on financial institutions that receive government aid by subjecting them to… [read post]
23 Mar 2009, 2:03 pm
Hewlett & Co., picked because of a "relationship of trust" Stanford had with its chief, the SEC said. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 11:44 pm
Lemley speaks of "patents once they are brought to a company's attention. [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 5:00 am
There is a lot of work ahead for Stanford’s lawyers in sorting out the facts, defending the company and defending the executives. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 1:47 am
According to a February 27, 2009 article in the Financial Post (here), on February 25, 2009, Calgary-based furniture manufacturer has initiated a class action lawsuit in the Alberta Court of Queen’s Bench against Allen Stanford, Stanford International Bank, Stanford Group Company, Stanford Capital Management LLC, James M. [read post]
25 Feb 2009, 11:54 pm
" In-house counsel also complain of too much arrogance and too little trust. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 1:05 am
The defendants in the case include Stanford Group Company and related Stanford entities, as well as R. [read post]
17 Feb 2009, 11:15 am
It appears that this is another huge betrayal of investor trust. [read post]
4 Dec 2008, 6:59 pm
Falik holds a B.A. and M.Ed. from Stanford University, and an M.B.A. from Harvard Business School.Mr. [read post]
1 Oct 2008, 9:18 am
The Seattle company said it wanted to protect consumers’ “fair-use rights” to make copies of their own purchased DVDs. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 1:58 am
The phrase is sometimes relevant in the trust and estates context when the trustor’s or the testator’s original intentions can no longer be fulfilled due to changed circumstances. [read post]