Search for: "Starbucks Corporation" Results 361 - 380 of 682
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
11 Feb 2014, 8:09 am
In the store’s published FAQ, Dumb Starbucks state they are not affiliated in any way with Starbucks Corporation: “We are simply using their name and logo for marketing purposes”. [read post]
10 Feb 2014, 12:10 pm by Matthew David Brozik
Dumb Starbucks is not affiliated in any way with Starbucks Corporation. [read post]
8 Feb 2014, 12:32 am by Kevin O'Keefe
As Clara Shih (@clarashih), CEO of Hearsay Social and Board Member at Starbucks, recently wrote in the Harvard Business Review, social at the corporate level means everyone in the corporation must participate. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 9:01 pm by Anita Ramasastry
On its corporate website, Target tells consumers, “Even if you shopped at Target during this time frame, it doesn’t mean you are a victim of fraud. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 6:22 am by Joy Waltemath
Finding that Starbucks’ policy of allowing shift supervisors to participate in store tip pools did not violate New York law, the Second Circuit in an unpublished decision affirmed a district court’s grant of summary judgment to Starbucks against an employee class action. [read post]
25 Nov 2013, 5:06 am by Jay Causey
     You’ve just bought a new car, or signed an employment agreement, or engaged an investment firm to act for you, or made substantial charges on your credit card, or even just bought a Starbucks card. [read post]
19 Nov 2013, 2:59 pm by Matthew David Brozik
Here are the salient points from what will be—unless Starbucks appeals to the Supreme Court—the last word in the matter [For some previous words, start here -- RDC] Just one of at least 56 marks… Way back in 2005, a bench trial was held in the Southern District to determine whether Wolfe’s Borough Coffee, a New Hampshire corporation doing business as “Black Bear Micro Roastery,” was infringing on some of the more than 56 registered trademarks of… [read post]
4 Nov 2013, 1:13 am
Most of these proposals, however, do not address the fundamental flaws in the international tax regime that allow companies like Apple or Starbucks to legally avoid taxation. [read post]
31 Oct 2013, 9:03 am by Doorey
 Tim Hortons Corporation knows that employees at other stores are watching this bargaining carefully. [read post]
8 Oct 2013, 1:22 pm by assoulineberlowe
In the spectrum of what will get the most protection, to the least, a mark that does not suggest the good being sold, like Starbucks and coffee, will be given more protection than Fresh Bananas at a supermarket. [read post]
6 Sep 2013, 12:06 pm by Michael
Guest PostUnless you’ve been hiding out in the Himalayas you can’t have missed the recent uproar over the extent of tax avoidance by global corporations like Google, Amazon and Starbucks. [read post]
14 Aug 2013, 7:52 am
He formed a company called  Portfolio Media.Meland  escaped the solitude of his apartment by writing at a local Starbucks. [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 1:10 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  The ethical component—are you a responsible corporate citizen—seems to have no particular connection to the factors for fame. [read post]
8 Aug 2013, 7:00 am by CEDR
So far 2013 has not been a vintage year for “the big corporation”. [read post]
22 Jul 2013, 10:41 am by Greg Mersol
  Starbucks treats its assistant managers as salaried exempt under state and federal law. [read post]