Search for: "Starr Insurance "
Results 361 - 380
of 647
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Mar 2021, 9:23 am
Coon of Miller Starr Regalia. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 1:44 pm
The California Supreme Court heard oral arguments in an important case we’ve been following involving CEQA’s definition of a “project” on the afternoon of June 4, 2019, and took the matter under submission. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 3:09 pm
The same appellate panel that decided the controversial Berkeley Hillside Preservation case (which is currently in the briefing stage of Supreme Court review) rendered another significant categorical exemption decision in its recently published opinion in Robinson v. [read post]
24 Apr 2013, 3:18 pm
Coon of Miller Starr Regalia. [read post]
3 Jan 2014, 2:11 pm
In an opinion recently ordered published, the First District Court of Appeal extensively reviewed the relevant case law and expressed skepticism that CEQA would operate in reverse to require analysis of potential impacts on a mixed-use project’s construction workers and future residents from pre-existing soil contamination at the project site. [read post]
30 Jul 2018, 10:24 am
Coon of Miller Starr Regalia. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 3:58 pm
Coon of Miller Starr Regalia. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 2:06 pm
Coon of Miller Starr Regalia. [read post]
14 Aug 2023, 9:11 am
Coon of Miller Starr Regalia. [read post]
22 Sep 2014, 2:55 pm
In a published decision filed September 15, 2014, the First District Court of Appeal reversed and remanded a trial court’s post-judgment order granting an unsuccessful CEQA petitioner’s motion to tax the entire $64,144 cost bill of respondent City. [read post]
15 Mar 2018, 4:26 pm
In a published opinion filed January 31, 2018, the Fifth District Court of Appeal affirmed the trial Court’s judgment issuing a writ of mandate voiding the California State Air Resources Board’s (“CARB”) 2014 amendments to its 2008 Truck and Bus Regulation and its related environmental review documents, which were the functional equivalent of a negative declaration under CARB’s certified regulatory program. [read post]
19 Dec 2016, 8:36 am
In an opinion filed December 7, and later ordered published on December 16, 2016, the Fourth District Court of Appeal affirmed a judgment denying a writ petition on the “single legal issue” whether plaintiffs were entitled under Public Resources Code § 21151(c) (and a municipal code section with essentially the same content) to an appeal of a planning commission’s “substantial conformance review” (SCR) determination to the city council. [read post]
1 Oct 2014, 11:29 am
Coon of Miller Starr Regalia. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 11:25 am
Coon of Miller Starr Regalia. [read post]
16 Jan 2020, 1:39 pm
CEQA’s Class 32 categorical exemption for “infill development” applies to proposed developments within city limits on sites of five or fewer acres substantially surrounded by urban uses, where the site has no habitat value for special status species, can be adequately served by all required utilities and public services, and the project would not have significant traffic, noise, air quality, or water quality impacts. [read post]
17 Nov 2017, 2:26 pm
Coon of Miller Starr Regalia. [read post]
10 Jan 2023, 3:28 pm
As all CEQA practitioners know, a prospective petitioner in a writ proceeding challenging a CEQA determination must first exhaust available administrative remedies as a prerequisite to filing suit. [read post]
1 Nov 2021, 2:04 pm
Coon of Miller Starr Regalia. [read post]
6 Jun 2013, 11:46 am
In a lengthy published opinion filed May 21, 2013, the First District Court of Appeal reversed a judgment granting a writ of mandate and upheld as legally adequate under CEQA the Marin Municipal Water District’s EIR for development and construction of a desalination plant in Marin County. [read post]
31 Aug 2017, 12:38 pm
Coon of Miller Starr Regalia. [read post]
