Search for: "State v. Clayton" Results 361 - 380 of 1,098
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Jun 2020, 9:00 pm by Rodger Citron
Clayton County, the Court’s recent decision holding that the federal law prohibiting employment discrimination applies to gay, lesbian, and transgender employees. [read post]
27 Jun 2020, 2:54 am
United States Securities and Exchange Commission and Walter Clayton, Respondents (Opinion, 2Cir)SEC Charges BNP Paribas with Violations of Regulation SHO (SEC Release)SEC Updates Filing Threshold to Rule 17h Reporting Requirements for Broker-Dealers (SEC Release)... [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 12:52 pm by NCC Staff
Clayton County—which held that sex discrimination protections in Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 apply to sexual orientation and gender identity—and says it was a sweeping victory for LGBTQ rights. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 9:14 am by Howard Friedman
The 2020 Rule directly contravenes the Supreme Court of the United States’ recent holding in Bostock v. [read post]
26 Jun 2020, 3:47 am by Edith Roberts
Texas, “the case brought by 20 Republican-led states that want to completely invalidate the law. [read post]
24 Jun 2020, 1:55 pm by Ilya Somin
Clayton County arguing that the Supreme Court dealt religious liberty in America a serious, dangerous blow. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 9:00 pm by Vikram David Amar
  This statute was mentioned by the Court in 1988 as support for its opinion in the famous independent counsel case, Morrison v. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 3:56 am by Edith Roberts
” At the Brennan Center for Justice, Ciara Torres-Spelliscy writes that if the Supreme Court rules for the “faithless elector” in Colorado Department of State v. [read post]
22 Jun 2020, 11:22 am by Resnick Law Group, P.C.
Clayton County, Georgia holds that Title VII’s prohibition on sex discrimination includes both categories. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 9:02 pm by Joanna L. Grossman and Deborah L. Brake
Clayton County is more than a decent substitute. [read post]
21 Jun 2020, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Although neither of President Trump’s appointees joined it, one of them—Justice Neil Gorsuch—wrote the majority opinion in Bostock v. [read post]