Search for: "State Employees v. Community College" Results 361 - 380 of 947
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
Subchapter V – Return to Work Reporting Requirement Employers have a method to report if an employee refuses to return to work Plain language about returning to work Subchapter VI – Other Related Provisions and Technical Corrections Pay an extra $100 per week to individuals who have at least $5,000 a year in self-employment income, but are disqualified from receiving Pandemic Unemployment Assistance because they are not eligible for regular state… [read post]
23 May 2023, 6:10 am by Eugene Volokh
Schrag then emailed the organizers of the Bethel conference — John Sharp (Hesston College employee), John Thiesen (Bethel College employee), and Mark Jantzen (Bethel College employee) — informing them of Plaintiff's plan to hold an event and attaching the pamphlet…. [read post]
30 Jul 2022, 12:16 pm by MEL
This is despite the Ontario College of Physicians and Surgeons, as well as the Ontario Ministry of Health, trying to limit what qualifies as a valid medical exemption. [read post]
24 Nov 2014, 3:03 pm by Law Lady
FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE CORPORATION, as receiver for Peoples First Community Bank Panama City, Florida, a.k.a. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 4:45 am by Steve Lombardi
The Iowa Court of Appeals in Gazette Communications, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 9:30 pm by RegBlog
IN THE NEWS The Supreme Court of the United States heard oral argument in U.S. v. [read post]
11 Jul 2021, 4:55 pm by INFORRM
Bastos, University College Dublin; City University London – School of Social Sciences. [read post]
19 Dec 2017, 3:08 pm by Marty Lederman
., married-student housing at a religious college) would better be viewed not as implicating compelled speech, but instead, as David Cole suggested at argument, as raising the question whether the Court would, or might, craft additional exceptions to the general free exercise doctrine of Employment Division v. [read post]
2 May 2022, 2:12 pm by Cynthia Marcotte Stamer
Emotional distress damages are not recoverable in a private action to enforce the disability discrimination and accommodation requirements of either the Rehabilitation Act of 1973 (“Rehab Act”) or the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (“ACA”) according to the May 1, 2022 United States Supreme Court ruling in Cummings v. [read post]