Search for: "State v. Alas"
Results 361 - 380
of 1,940
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Jul 2007, 12:05 pm
State, 2007 Ala. [read post]
20 Jan 2015, 11:46 am
Ala. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 4:30 am
United States, 28 F.2d 1017 (2d Cir. 1928)Rouda v. [read post]
5 Mar 2018, 5:50 am
Samuels v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 11:43 am
“It’s highly likely we will take this case to the Supreme Court,” said Edward Blum, director of the Project on Fair Representation, a legal defense fund that backed the challenge in Shelby County, Ala. v. [read post]
3 May 2009, 11:29 am
A classic Souter concurrence reads: "I am not through regretting that my position in United States v. [read post]
8 Oct 2009, 7:37 am
Alas, I've been busy with other things, and haven't paid close attention to the Salazar v. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 3:33 pm
United States v. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 1:42 pm
The Court extended that Amendment, and with it, the exclusionary rule, to state and local governments in the 1961 case of Mapp v. [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 11:49 am
This week at the CCAs: AFCCA will hear oral argument at 1000 tomorrow in United States v. [read post]
10 Sep 2012, 3:25 am
State, 2012 Ala. [read post]
2 Oct 2007, 6:12 am
State, 2007 Ala. [read post]
3 May 2012, 2:30 am
Supreme Court Petroleo Brasileiro SA v ENE Kos 1 Ltd [2012] UKSC 17 (2 May 2012) Court of Appeal (Civil Division) OB v The Director of the Serious Fraud Office [2012] EWCA Civ 501 (02 May 2012) ConvaTec Ltd & Ors v Smith & Nephew Healthcare Ltd & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 520 (02 May 2012) Kizhakudan v Secretary of State for Home Department [2012] EWCA Civ 566 (02 May 2012) Birmingham City Council v Akhtar & Ors [2012] EWCA Civ 585… [read post]
25 May 2009, 5:18 pm
LEXIS 14 at * 10 (Ala. 2009); Lefever v. [read post]
11 Mar 2009, 6:15 am
United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2012, 9:05 pm
” United States v. [read post]
10 Oct 2010, 7:45 pm
State, 2010 Ala. [read post]
21 Mar 2012, 9:12 am
Although disparate impact may be relevant evidence of discrimination such evidence is insufficient to prove a constitutional violation even where the Fourteenth Amendment subjects state action to strict scrutiny, the plurality explained, citing Board of Trustees of Univ of Ala v Garrett (8 ADD ¶8-198). [read post]
21 Mar 2013, 3:04 pm
Howard v. [read post]
