Search for: "State v. B. T." Results 361 - 380 of 18,319
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
31 Oct 2016, 8:35 am by Charlotte Bamford
However, Soering was distinguished from the present case on the basis that “[t]he decision of the Secretary of State to serve judgment on [Mr Ismail] did not expose him to the risk of violation of his Convention rights“. [read post]
29 Oct 2014, 7:04 pm
Category B means you won't B taking their depo, and Rothenberg says that is reversible error. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 5:00 am by Daniel Snare
Last term, the Supreme Court addressed the extraterritorial application of Rule 10b-5 in Morrison v. [read post]
24 Apr 2016, 10:11 am by Simon Lester
The provisions of: (b) Article 1106(1)(b), (c), (f) and (g), and (3)(a) and (b) do not apply to procurement by a Party or a state enterprise; […]. [read post]
10 Aug 2020, 8:51 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Defendants challenged the availability of equitable restitution pursuant to Section 13(b) of the FTCA, which states “[t]hat in proper cases the Commission may seek, and after proper proof, the court may issue, a permanent injunction. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 8:10 am by Public Employment Law Press
Supreme Court granted New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance's [ODTA] CPLR §211 motion to dismiss the Petitioner's claims against it under the New York City Human Rights Law [City HRL] alleging national origin discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law [State HRL], and for alleged violation of Civil Service Law §75-b. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 8:10 am by Public Employment Law Press
Supreme Court granted New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance's [ODTA] CPLR §211 motion to dismiss the Petitioner's claims against it under the New York City Human Rights Law [City HRL] alleging national origin discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law [State HRL], and for alleged violation of Civil Service Law §75-b. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 8:10 am by Public Employment Law Press
Supreme Court granted New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance's [ODTA] CPLR §211 motion to dismiss the Petitioner's claims against it under the New York City Human Rights Law [City HRL] alleging national origin discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law [State HRL], and for alleged violation of Civil Service Law §75-b. [read post]
8 Oct 2021, 8:10 am by Public Employment Law Press
Supreme Court granted New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance's [ODTA] CPLR §211 motion to dismiss the Petitioner's claims against it under the New York City Human Rights Law [City HRL] alleging national origin discrimination under the New York State Human Rights Law [State HRL], and for alleged violation of Civil Service Law §75-b. [read post]