Search for: "State v. Bates" Results 361 - 380 of 566
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Jun 2024, 1:56 am by INFORRM
On 17 June 2024 there was a pre-trial review in the case of Bates v Rubuython KB-2023-002975 before Collins Rice J and a disposal hearing in the case of Codnor v Thorpe QB-2020-004564 before Richard Spearman KC. [read post]
18 Jul 2014, 11:55 am
  We await the reargued decision with bated breath – actually that’s not true; we’d be bluer than a Blue Dog Democrat if that were so. [read post]
6 Apr 2014, 9:30 am by Lyle Denniston
Under a 1971 Supreme Court decision, Bivens v. [read post]
12 Jan 2018, 4:07 am by Edith Roberts
United States and Collins v. [read post]
11 Mar 2008, 8:46 am
Phillips, No. 07-0522 Grant of habeas petition ordering conviction be vacated based on state's Brady violation is vacated in part as to barring of retrial of count of depraved indifference murder as petitioner had not exhausted his state remedies with respect to that relief. [read post]
8 May 2015, 7:56 am
  The exceedingly long decision of the court in Grocery Manufacturers Assoc. v. [read post]
26 Sep 2024, 8:26 am by Eleonora Rosati
Hobbs provided a thorough review of the relevant case law on recusals, including a reference to the UK Post Office scandal in Bates v Post Office Limited [2019] EWHC 871 (QB), paragraphs [27]-[77] as well as HCA International Ltd v Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) [2015] EWCA Civ 492. [read post]
28 May 2024, 11:38 am by INFORRM
On Thursday 23 May 2024 there was a pre-trial review in Bates v Rubython and Another KB-2023-002975. [read post]
14 Nov 2016, 12:25 am by INFORRM
On the same day the oral renewal of the application for permission to appeal in the case of Weston v Bates was refused by Sharp LJ. [read post]
4 Jan 2009, 3:24 pm
There is no timetable for Judge Bates to rule on the motion to dismiss. [read post]
27 Aug 2008, 4:21 pm
  For one, the court noted that while express preemption provisions may reach beyond positive enactments to embrace common law duties (see, e.g., Bates v. [read post]