Search for: "State v. Bland" Results 361 - 380 of 406
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
7 May 2009, 6:08 am
As the court stated in McClain:[A]nother methodological problem undermines [the expert's] analogical approach. . . . [read post]
9 Mar 2009, 3:02 pm
In the meantime, I can state with certainty my belief that IP policy has a lot to do with culture as I understand it. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 9:11 pm
Bland, 4366, 1884/06, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, 2008 NY Slip Op 8008; 55 A.D.3d 428; 866 N.Y.S.2d 68; 2008 N.Y. [read post]
27 Oct 2008, 3:40 pm
Bland, 4366, 1884/06, SUPREME COURT OF NEW YORK, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT, 2008 NY Slip Op 8008; 2008 N.Y. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 5:01 am
Since the 1970's when the Supreme Court of the United States decided that lawyers could advertise (Bates v. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 12:00 pm
But as we will see below, sometimes this bland language is a prelude to concrete change, although it is unclear when this will happen. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 2:07 am
by Paul Bland The United States Justice Department has completely disgraced itself. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 10:01 pm
Quoting CAAF's opinion in United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2008, 6:45 am
A recent graduate from Catholic University's School of Law, Elizabeth Getman, at the ripe old age of 27, is already serving as co-counsel to Andrew Herman of the Bland Law Group in DC as he argues the case of Jack Davis v. [read post]