Search for: "State v. C. G. B."
Results 361 - 380
of 2,342
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Dec 2017, 12:16 pm
See State v. [read post]
11 Dec 2017, 12:16 pm
See State v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 7:40 am
Caldwell v. [read post]
3 Nov 2010, 1:25 pm
The dollar limitation under Section 414(v)(2)(B)(ii) for catch-up contributions to an applicable employer plan described in Section 401(k)(11) or Section 408(p) for individuals aged 50 or over remains unchanged at $2,500. [read post]
8 Mar 2022, 4:00 am
C. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 1:31 pm
James G. [read post]
13 Jul 2011, 6:42 am
The following is an essay for our symposium on Arizona v. [read post]
9 Oct 2008, 6:14 pm
See Wyeth v. [read post]
3 Jul 2012, 9:46 am
(c) “This is Brian Cooper. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 1:20 pm
Edmund G. [read post]
18 Apr 2017, 8:44 pm
c. [read post]
7 Jan 2013, 6:17 am
Greer, Terence Healy, and Lisa G. [read post]
17 Sep 2012, 7:00 am
In Borrome v. [read post]
6 Jan 2022, 12:00 am
C. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:00 am
Notably, the petitioner did not testify that she had directed any of her aides to specifically supervise the student at the time of the incident.Under these circumstances, substantial evidence supports the determination of the Justice Center that the petitioner committed category three neglect (see Matter of Williams v New York State Justice Ctr. for the Protection of People with Special Needs, 151 AD3d at 1356-1357; see also Matter of Kelly v New York State… [read post]
11 Mar 2010, 12:00 pm
See, State v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 9:57 am
The Missile Defense Complex shall be composed of: a. administrative, maintenance, and repair facilities; b. water supply facility; c. utility distribution facility; d. generator power facility; e. communications facilities; f. fuel storage and distribution facility; g. security entrance and exit control station; h. security monitoring facility; i. storage area; j. interceptor launcher modules; k. explosives storage facility; l. radar structure; and m. command facility. [read post]
20 Nov 2018, 11:06 pm
Main Request, Rule 111(2) EPC2.1 At the time when the contested decision was issued, the requirements for issuing a refusal using a standard form referring to previous communications were set out in the Guidelines for Examination in the EPO, November 2016, C-V, 15.2.According to the first paragraph of Guideline C-V, 15.2, in order to comply with the requirement that a decision be reasoned (Rule 111(2)), it is only possible to use this form of decision where the… [read post]
6 Mar 2017, 4:26 pm
In U.S. v. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 11:36 am
R. 26 Duty to Disclose; General Provisions Governing Discovery District of Wyoming V. [read post]
