Search for: "State v. Concepcion" Results 361 - 380 of 1,030
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
24 Apr 2012, 10:46 am by Wystan M. Ackerman
Concepcion are of limited help to defendants in state court because, while many state courts follow federal law on class certification, they are not required to do so. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 8:31 am by Beth Graham
Yesterday, the United States Supreme Court issued a decision in American Express Corp. v. [read post]
5 Jun 2012, 3:13 pm by Jay Eng
Concepcion, 131 S.Ct. 1740 (2011), maintained that “state law bearing on contracts of adhesion remains good law. [read post]
1 Oct 2012, 6:44 am by Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
   In reaching its conclusion, the Court of Appeals relied on the April 2011 United States Supreme Court’s landmark decision in AT&T Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
28 Sep 2012, 6:08 am by Epstein Becker Green
   In reaching its conclusion, the Court of Appeals relied on the April 2011 United States Supreme Court’s landmark decision in AT&T Mobility, LLC v. [read post]
31 May 2016, 1:28 pm by John Lewis and Dustin Dow
Horton opinion and for overstating the effect of Concepcion where a state law hostile to arbitration is not present. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 5:19 am
 So, the California Supreme Court just issued the following order:In light of the United States Supreme Court's order vacating our judgment in the above-entitled case and remanding the cause to this court "for further consideration in light of AT&T Mobility LLC. v. [read post]
27 Apr 2011, 6:19 pm by Colin O'Keefe
 We have a wealth of varying viewpoints on AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 7:30 am by Beth Graham
Tomorrow, the United States Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in American Express Corp. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2013, 7:30 am by Beth Graham
Tomorrow, the United States Supreme Court will hear oral argument in American Express Corp. v. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 7:54 am by John Lewis and Dustin Dow
After all, coming from an influential jurisdiction like California, Iskanian’s analysis of Concepcion in the context of PAGA claims created a wide exception that other states may choose to follow. [read post]
15 Jun 2012, 2:38 pm by The Complex Litigator
As the Concepcion court reiterated, “States cannot require a procedure that is inconsistent with the FAA, even if it is desirable for unrelated reasons. [read post]